Hu Xiao, Liu Zhaomin, Li Tongtong, Luo Liang
a State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning , Beijing Normal University , Beijing , China.
b School of Sociology , China University of Political Science and Law , Beijing , China.
Memory. 2016;24(3):383-98. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1009470. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
Previous studies have suggested that perceptual information regarding to-be-remembered words in the study phase affects the accuracy of judgement of learning (JOL). However, few have investigated whether the perceptual information in the JOL phase influences JOL accuracy. This study examined the influence of cue word perceptual information in the JOL phase on immediate and delayed JOL accuracy through changes in cue word font size. In Experiment 1, large-cue word pairs had significantly higher mean JOL magnitude than small-cue word pairs in immediate JOLs and higher relative accuracy than small-cue pairs in delayed JOLs, but font size had no influence on recall performance. Experiment 2 increased the JOL time, and mean JOL magnitude did not reliably differ for large-cue compared with small-cue pairs in immediate JOLs. However, the influence on relative accuracy still existed in delayed JOLs. Experiment 3 increased the familiarity of small-cue words in the delayed JOL phase by adding a lexical decision task. The results indicated that cue word font size no longer affected relative accuracy in delayed JOLs. The three experiments in our study indicated that the perceptual information regarding cue words in the JOL phase affects immediate and delayed JOLs in different ways.
以往的研究表明,学习阶段中与待记忆单词相关的感知信息会影响学习判断(JOL)的准确性。然而,很少有人研究JOL阶段的感知信息是否会影响JOL的准确性。本研究通过改变提示词字体大小,考察了JOL阶段提示词感知信息对即时和延迟JOL准确性的影响。在实验1中,在即时JOL中,大提示词对的平均JOL幅度显著高于小提示词对,在延迟JOL中,其相对准确性高于小提示词对,但字体大小对回忆表现没有影响。实验2延长了JOL时间,在即时JOL中,大提示词对与小提示词对的平均JOL幅度没有可靠差异。然而,在延迟JOL中,对相对准确性的影响仍然存在。实验3通过添加词汇判断任务提高了延迟JOL阶段中小提示词的熟悉度。结果表明,提示词字体大小在延迟JOL中不再影响相对准确性。我们研究中的三个实验表明,JOL阶段中关于提示词的感知信息以不同方式影响即时和延迟JOL。