Chung H S, Shin D H, Birt C M, Kim C, Lee D, Levin D S, Hakimzadeh R, Juzych M S
Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1423, USA.
Ophthalmology. 1997 Nov;104(11):1921-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30006-2.
The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy of 1.0% apraclonidine in preventing intraocular pressure (IOP) spike after argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) in patients on chronic apraclonidine therapy compared with patients not on chronic apraclonidine use.
The study design was a prospective study.
This study consisted of 231 consecutive eyes of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma undergoing ALT: 70 eyes (30%) were started on a regimen including chronic apraclonidine 0.5% use (group A) and 161 eyes (70%) were started on a regimen without chronic apraclonidine 0.5% use (group B).
Both groups received one drop of apraclonidine 1.0% 15 minutes before ALT to 180 degrees of previously untreated trabecular meshwork. Intraocular pressure was measured before the procedure and at 5 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours after the laser treatment.
Incidences of an IOP spike and mean IOPs at 5 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours after the laser treatment were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also was carried out to identify the significant risk factors for post-ALT IOP spikes despite prophylactic apraclonidine 1.0% treatment.
The incidences of IOP spikes greater than 0 mmHg, greater than 2 mmHg, and greater than 5 mmHg at 1 hour after ALT were 32.9%, 22.9%, and 12.9%, respectively, in group A versus 13.7%, 11%, and 3.1%, respectively, in group B (P = 0.0007, P = 0.009, and P = 0.004). Chronic apraclonidine 0.5% use was found to be the only significant risk factor for IOP spikes at 1 hour after ALT by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
The incidences of IOP spikes in group A were significantly greater than in group B and approached the reported incidences of IOP spikes without perilaser apraclonidine prophylaxis. This indicates that peri-ALT apraclonidine is relatively ineffective in patients with chronic apraclonidine 0.5% use (group A) compared with patients without chronic apraclonidine use (group B), presumably because of saturation of the ocular alpha-2 receptors with apraclonidine in patients with chronic apraclonidine use. Therefore, in patients receiving chronic apraclonidine therapy, it is especially important to monitor their post-ALT IOPs and to be prepared to treat postlaser IOP spikes using agents other than apraclonidine.
本研究旨在探讨与未长期使用阿可乐定的患者相比,长期接受阿可乐定治疗的患者在氩激光小梁成形术(ALT)后使用1.0%阿可乐定预防眼压(IOP)升高的疗效。
本研究设计为前瞻性研究。
本研究纳入了231例接受ALT的原发性开角型青光眼患者的连续眼:70只眼(30%)开始使用包括长期使用0.5%阿可乐定的方案(A组),161只眼(70%)开始使用不包括长期使用0.5%阿可乐定的方案(B组)。
两组在ALT前15分钟均向180度先前未治疗的小梁网滴入一滴1.0%阿可乐定。在手术前以及激光治疗后5分钟、1小时和24小时测量眼压。
比较两组激光治疗后5分钟、1小时和24小时眼压升高的发生率以及平均眼压。还进行了多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定尽管使用了预防性1.0%阿可乐定治疗,但ALT后眼压升高的显著危险因素。
ALT后1小时眼压升高大于0 mmHg、大于2 mmHg和大于5 mmHg的发生率在A组分别为32.9%、22.9%和12.9%,而在B组分别为13.7%、11%和3.1%(P = 0.0007,P = 0.009,P = 0.004)。多因素逻辑回归分析发现,长期使用0.5%阿可乐定是ALT后1小时眼压升高的唯一显著危险因素。
A组眼压升高的发生率显著高于B组,且接近未进行激光前阿可乐定预防时报道的眼压升高发生率。这表明与未长期使用阿可乐定的患者(B组)相比,长期使用0.5%阿可乐定的患者(A组)在ALT期间使用阿可乐定预防眼压升高相对无效,推测是因为长期使用阿可乐定的患者眼内α-2受体被阿可乐定饱和。因此,在接受长期阿可乐定治疗的患者中,尤其重要的是监测其ALT后的眼压,并准备好使用阿可乐定以外的药物治疗激光后眼压升高。