Suppr超能文献

1%阿可乐定与4%毛果芸香碱预防氩激光小梁成形术后眼压升高的疗效比较

Efficacy of apraclonidine 1% versus pilocarpine 4% for prophylaxis of intraocular pressure spike after argon laser trabeculoplasty.

作者信息

Ren J, Shin D H, Chung H S, Birt C M, Glover B K, Juzych M S, Hughes B A, Kim C

机构信息

Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1423, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1999 Jun;106(6):1135-9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90260-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared the efficacy of apraclonidine 1% versus pilocarpine 4% prophylaxis of post-argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) intraocular pressure (IOP) spike.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred twenty-eight eyes of 228 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma undergoing ALT were studied.

INTERVENTION

Patients were given 1 drop of either apraclonidine 1% (n = 114) or pilocarpine 4% (n = 114) 15 minutes before ALT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Peri-ALT IOPs and incidences of post-ALT IOP spikes at 5 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in age, race, and medical dependency. Post-ALT mean IOPs at 5 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours were significantly lower than pre-ALT mean IOPs in both apraclonidine (P < 0.001) and pilocarpine (P < 0.001) groups. Incidences of IOP spikes greater than 1, 3, and 5 mmHg at 1 hour post-ALT were 21.1%, 14.9%, and 8.8% for the apraclonidine group and 12.3%, 5.3%, and 4.4% for the pilocarpine group (P = 0.076, 0.015, and 0.18 chi-square test). In the apraclonidine prophylaxis group, patients on long-term apraclonidine showed significantly higher incidence of post-ALT IOP spike than the patients without such long-term apraclonidine use (35.7%, 15 of 42 eyes, vs. 12.5%, 9 of 72 eyes; P = 0.003). In addition, peri-ALT pilocarpine prophylaxis tended to be less effective in patients undergoing long-term pilocarpine therapy but without statistical significance (17.4%, 8 of 46 eyes, vs. 9.4%, 6 of 64 eyes; P = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Peri-ALT pilocarpine 4% was at least as effective as, if not more effective than, apraclonidine 1% in post-ALT IOP spike prophylaxis. Peri-ALT apraclonidine prophylaxis was not effective in patients on long-term apraclonidine, and peri-ALT pilocarpine prophylaxis tended to be less effective in patients undergoing long-term pilocarpine therapy. Pilocarpine 4% can be considered as a first-choice drug for post-ALT IOP spike prophylaxis, especially in patients under treatment with apraclonidine.

摘要

目的

作者比较了1%阿可乐定与4%毛果芸香碱预防氩激光小梁成形术(ALT)后眼压(IOP)升高的疗效。

设计

前瞻性随机临床试验。

参与者

对228例接受ALT的原发性开角型青光眼患者的228只眼进行了研究。

干预措施

在ALT前15分钟,给患者滴1滴1%阿可乐定(n = 114)或4%毛果芸香碱(n = 114)。

主要观察指标

比较两组在ALT期间及ALT后5分钟、1小时和24小时IOP升高的发生率。

结果

两组在年龄、种族和医疗依赖方面相似。在阿可乐定组(P < 0.001)和毛果芸香碱组(P < 0.001)中,ALT后5分钟、1小时和24小时的平均IOP均显著低于ALT前的平均IOP。ALT后1小时,阿可乐定组IOP升高大于1、3和5 mmHg的发生率分别为21.1%、14.9%和8.8%,毛果芸香碱组分别为12.3%、5.3%和4.4%(卡方检验,P = 0.076、0.015和0.18)。在阿可乐定预防组中,长期使用阿可乐定的患者ALT后IOP升高的发生率显著高于未长期使用阿可乐定的患者(35.7%,42只眼中有15只, vs. 12.5%,72只眼中有9只;P = 0.003)。此外,在长期接受毛果芸香碱治疗的患者中,ALT期间使用毛果芸香碱预防的效果往往较差,但无统计学意义(17.4%,46只眼中有8只, vs. 9.4%,64只眼中有6只;P = 0.17)。

结论

在预防ALT后IOP升高方面,4%毛果芸香碱在ALT期间至少与1%阿可乐定一样有效,甚至可能更有效。长期使用阿可乐定的患者,ALT期间使用阿可乐定预防无效;长期接受毛果芸香碱治疗的患者,ALT期间使用毛果芸香碱预防的效果往往较差。4%毛果芸香碱可被视为预防ALT后IOP升高的首选药物,尤其是在接受阿可乐定治疗的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验