Suppr超能文献

泰国恙虫病四种血清学诊断检测方法的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of four serodiagnostic tests for scrub typhus in Thailand.

作者信息

Pradutkanchana J, Silpapojakul K, Paxton H, Pradutkanchana S, Kelly D J, Strickman D

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkhla University, Thailand.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Jul-Aug;91(4):425-8. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(97)90266-2.

Abstract

The commercial dot-blot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Dip-S-Ticks dipstick test was compared with the indirect immunoperoxidase (IIP) and Weil-Felix (WF) tests for the diagnosis of scrub typhus, using the indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFA) as the reference standard. With a panel of 117 positive and 75 negative sera, the dipstick test was 94% sensitive and 98.7% specific at a cut-off value of one or more positive dots. The IIP was 90.6% sensitive and 100% specific at a cut-off titre of 1:400, and was more sensitive than the IFA with acute sera (79.6% vs. 68.5% at a titre > or = 1:400). All 3 were superior to the WF, which lacked sensitivity. The dipstick assay was easy to perform and did not require sophisticated electrical equipment, and the results were available within one hour. It is therefore suitable for use in rural Thailand, where scrub typhus is common.

摘要

采用间接免疫荧光抗体试验(IFA)作为参考标准,将商业化的斑点印迹酶联免疫吸附测定Dip-S-Ticks试纸条检测与间接免疫过氧化物酶(IIP)试验和外斐(WF)试验进行比较,以诊断恙虫病。使用一组117份阳性血清和75份阴性血清,当临界值为一个或多个阳性点时,试纸条检测的敏感性为94%,特异性为98.7%。IIP在临界滴度为1:400时,敏感性为90.6%,特异性为100%,并且对于急性期血清比IFA更敏感(滴度≥1:400时,分别为79.6%对68.5%)。所有这三种检测方法均优于缺乏敏感性的WF试验。试纸条检测易于操作,不需要复杂的电气设备,并且在一小时内即可获得结果。因此,它适用于恙虫病常见的泰国农村地区。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验