Blacksell Stuart D, Tanganuchitcharnchai Ampai, Nawtaisong Pruksa, Kantipong Pacharee, Laongnualpanich Achara, Day Nicholas P J, Paris Daniel H
Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Dec 9;23(2):148-54. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00553-15. Print 2016 Feb.
In this study, we examined the diagnostic accuracy of the InBios Scrub Typhus Detect IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and determined the optimal diagnostic optical density (OD) cutoffs for screening and diagnostic applications based on prospectively collected, characterized samples from undifferentiated febrile illness patients in northern Thailand. Direct comparisons with the serological gold standard, indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), revealed strong statistical correlation of ELISA OD values and IFA IgM titers. Determination of the optimal ELISA cutoff for seroepidemiology or screening purposes compared to the corresponding IFA reciprocal titer of 400 as previously described for Thailand was 0.60 OD, which corresponded to a sensitivity (Sn) of 84% and a specificity (Sp) of 98%. The diagnostic performance against the improved and more-stringent scrub typhus infection criteria (STIC), correcting for low false-positive IFA titers, resulted in an Sn of 93% and an Sp of 91% at an ELISA cutoff of 0.5 OD. This diagnostic ELISA cutoff corresponds to IFA reciprocal titers of 1,600 to 3,200, which greatly reduces the false-positive rates associated with low-positive IFA titers. These data are in congruence with the recently improved serodiagnostic positivity criteria using the Bayesian latent class modeling approach. In summary, the InBios Scrub Typhus Detect IgM ELISA is affordable and easy-to-use, with adequate diagnostic accuracy for screening and diagnostic purposes, and should be considered an improved alternative to the gold standard IFA for acute diagnosis. For broader application, regional cutoff validation and antigenic composition for consistent diagnostic accuracy should be considered.
在本研究中,我们检测了InBios恙虫病检测IgM酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的诊断准确性,并根据前瞻性收集的来自泰国北部未分化发热疾病患者的特征性样本,确定了用于筛查和诊断应用的最佳诊断光密度(OD)临界值。与血清学金标准间接免疫荧光测定(IFA)的直接比较显示,ELISA OD值与IFA IgM滴度具有很强的统计学相关性。与泰国先前描述的相应IFA倒数滴度400相比,用于血清流行病学或筛查目的的最佳ELISA临界值为0.60 OD,其对应灵敏度(Sn)为84%,特异性(Sp)为98%。针对改进的、更严格的恙虫病感染标准(STIC)进行诊断性能检测,校正低假阳性IFA滴度后,在ELISA临界值为0.5 OD时,Sn为93%,Sp为91%。该诊断ELISA临界值对应于IFA倒数滴度1600至3200,这大大降低了与低阳性IFA滴度相关的假阳性率。这些数据与最近使用贝叶斯潜在类别建模方法改进的血清学诊断阳性标准一致。总之,InBios恙虫病检测IgM ELISA价格低廉且易于使用,具有足够的筛查和诊断准确性,应被视为急性诊断中金标准IFA的改进替代方法。为了更广泛地应用,应考虑进行区域临界值验证和抗原组成以确保一致的诊断准确性。