Frassineti G L, Zoli W, Silvestro L, Serra P, Milandri C, Tienghi A, Gianni L, Gentile A, Salzano E, Amadori D
Department of Medical Oncology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Semin Oncol. 1997 Oct;24(5 Suppl 17):S17-19-S17-25.
Based on preclinical data, phase I/II clinical trials were performed at Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo (IOR) Operative Units (Medical Oncology Departments of Forlì, Rimini, and Ravenna, Italy) to determine the efficacy and toxicity of sequential administration of doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer that either had been previously untreated or that had relapsed after adjuvant therapy. In the phase I trial, 19 patients received bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) followed after a 16-hour interval by paclitaxel (given at dose levels ranging from 130 to 250 mg/m2) by 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks, for a maximum of eight cycles. Paclitaxel doses were escalated in 30-mg/m2 increments if the maximum tolerated dose had not been reached in the previous dose level. Analysis of the 128 cycles assessable for toxicity demonstrated neutropenia (<500/microL) in 26 courses (20.3%), with no significant clinical events. No relevant clinical cardiotoxicity was observed. The paclitaxel maximum tolerated dose was not reached at the 250-mg/m2 dose level (no grade 3 or 4 extramedullary toxicity). In the IOR phase II trial, 13 patients were treated with fixed doses of both drugs (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 220 mg/m2). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 39 of the 95 cycles, but was complicated by fever in only eight cycles (8.4%); three cycles required granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Peripheral neurotoxicity was the most common extramedullary side effect noted. Overall clinical responses in the IOR trials included 10 complete responses (31.3%) and 15 partial responses (46.9%), with an objective response rate of 78.1%. Comparison of these results with those obtained from a phase I trial using the opposite drug sequence showed comparable overall response rates, but IOR's sequence was associated with a higher complete response rate, as well as less frequent and less severe nonhematologic toxicity.
基于临床前数据,在罗马涅肿瘤研究所(IOR)的手术科室(意大利弗利、里米尼和拉文纳的医学肿瘤学部门)开展了I/II期临床试验,以确定先给予阿霉素随后给予紫杉醇(泰素;百时美施贵宝公司,新泽西州普林斯顿)序贯给药方案在治疗既往未接受过治疗或辅助治疗后复发的晚期乳腺癌患者中的疗效和毒性。在I期试验中,19例患者接受阿霉素静脉推注(50mg/m²),间隔16小时后,每3周通过3小时输注给予紫杉醇(剂量水平为130至250mg/m²),最多8个周期。如果在前一剂量水平未达到最大耐受剂量,则紫杉醇剂量以30mg/m²的增量递增。对128个可评估毒性的周期进行分析显示,26个疗程(20.3%)出现中性粒细胞减少(<500/μL),无显著临床事件。未观察到相关的临床心脏毒性。在250mg/m²剂量水平未达到紫杉醇的最大耐受剂量(无3级或4级髓外毒性)。在IOR的II期试验中,13例患者接受两种药物的固定剂量治疗(阿霉素50mg/m²和紫杉醇220mg/m²)。95个周期中有39个出现4级中性粒细胞减少,但仅8个周期(8.4%)并发发热;3个周期需要粒细胞集落刺激因子支持。外周神经毒性是最常见的髓外副作用。IOR试验中的总体临床反应包括10例完全缓解(31.3%)和15例部分缓解(46.9%),客观缓解率为78.1%。将这些结果与使用相反药物顺序的I期试验结果进行比较,总体缓解率相当,但IOR的顺序与更高的完全缓解率以及更不频繁和更不严重的非血液学毒性相关。