Franken E A, Whitten P, Smith W L
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242, USA.
J Telemed Telecare. 1996;2(3):155-60. doi: 10.1258/1357633961929989.
We investigated the perceived quality of teleradiology services offered at a rural hospital in comparison with radiology provided by three other methods: 'circuit riding', an on-site radiologist, and a hybrid arrangement. The research design was a case study, with interviews of administrators, technologists and physicians at the rural hospital, followed by a structured survey of all staff physicians. Responses were analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Both interviews and the survey indicated that teleradiology was perceived to be as accurate as on-site film interpretation. All other aspects of the service--efficiency, reports, communications and the overall contribution to patient care--were judged to be poorer than on-site radiology. We conclude that the provision of acceptable teleradiology requires considerable attention to all aspects of the radiology service, with attention to differences in institutional culture and mission, and to communication.
我们调查了一家乡村医院提供的远程放射学服务的感知质量,并将其与其他三种放射学提供方式进行了比较:“巡回服务”、现场放射科医生以及混合安排。研究设计为案例研究,先是对乡村医院的管理人员、技术人员和医生进行访谈,然后对所有在职医生进行结构化调查。对回复进行了定性和定量分析。访谈和调查均表明,远程放射学被认为与现场胶片解读一样准确。服务的所有其他方面——效率、报告、沟通以及对患者护理的总体贡献——都被判定比现场放射学差。我们得出结论,要提供可接受的远程放射学服务,需要对放射学服务的各个方面给予相当的关注,注意机构文化和使命的差异以及沟通问题。