Sittek H, Kessler M, Heuck A F, Bredl T, Perlet C, Künzer I, Lebeau A, Untch M, Reiser M
Institut für Radiologische Diagnostik, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München.
Rofo. 1997 Sep;167(3):247-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015527.
The detectability with magnetic resonance mammography (MR-M) of non-invasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), its morphology, and patterns of contrast enhancement were studied.
A total of 849 MR-M examinations were performed in 741 patients using a dynamic, contrast-enhanced FLASH 3D sequence at 1.0 T. Surgical breast biopsies were obtained in 332 cases. Histological work-up confirmed 164 carcinomas, including 20 DCIS.
Of 20 DCIS, 14 were correctly diagnosed by MR-M on the basis of focal increase of signal intensity. In two cases (10%), no increase of signal intensity was observed. In another three cases (15%), multifocal enhancement lead to a false-negative diagnosis. In one case (5%), DCIS was a random finding in a patient diagnosed and treated for adjacent phylloides tumour. The sensitivity of MR-M was 70%. 4 (20%) of the DCIS did not show microcalcifications at conventional mammography and were only detected at MR-M. The sensitivity of conventional mammography also amounted to 70%. However, the combination of both imaging methods increased sensitivity to 90%.
Ductal carcinoma in situ is not reliably detectable by MR-mammography alone due to lack of a uniform pattern of enhancement.
研究磁共振乳腺成像(MR-M)对非浸润性导管原位癌(DCIS)的可检测性、其形态及对比增强模式。
741例患者共进行了849次MR-M检查,采用1.0 T动态对比增强FLASH 3D序列。332例患者接受了乳腺手术活检。组织学检查确诊164例癌,其中包括20例DCIS。
20例DCIS中,14例基于信号强度局灶性增加被MR-M正确诊断。2例(10%)未观察到信号强度增加。另外3例(15%)多灶性增强导致假阴性诊断。1例(5%)DCIS是在一名因相邻叶状肿瘤接受诊断和治疗的患者中偶然发现的。MR-M的敏感性为70%。4例(20%)DCIS在传统乳腺X线摄影中未显示微钙化,仅在MR-M中被检测到。传统乳腺X线摄影的敏感性也为70%。然而,两种成像方法联合使用可将敏感性提高至90%。
由于缺乏统一的增强模式,仅通过磁共振乳腺成像不能可靠地检测导管原位癌。