Trauzettel-Klosinski S
Abt. für Pathophysiologie des Sehens und Neuroophthalmologie, Univ. Augenklinik Tübingen.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1997 Aug;211(2):73-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035101.
The diagnosis of malingering and functional visual loss should be proven by specific tests-after the exclusion of differential diagnoses such as optical disturbances, amblyopia, early stages of macula and optic nerve disease and cortical lesions. Malingering and functional visual loss are based on different causes and pathogenetic mechanisms. However, they produce the same symptoms and can therefore be examined by the same methods. The strategy consists of three parts: 1) check the reproducibility of the results, 2) specific procedures: provocation of reflectory responses, deception, measurement of the same function with different methods and objective methods and 3) proof. In alleged bilateral blindness the provocation of reflexes and deceptive strategies are especially useful, in alleged bilateral reduction of visual acuity deceptive methods (related to the size of the optotype), the examination of central vision by other methods (equivalents to visual acuity) and objective methods are applied. In alleged monolateral blindness or reduction of visual acuity the binocular tests are valuable. Additionally, methods to provoke reflexes, especially pupil reaction, are used as well as the measure of equivalents to visual acuity. In alleged concentric constriction of the visual fields three strategies are mainly used: 1) check if visual field size is in accordance with the visual angle, 2) different methods to examine the isopters and 3) different perimetric methods. In case of an alleged hemianopic field defect the following methods are of special value: 1) binocular examination, 2) reading ability, 3) different perimetric methods and 4) half-field stimulation. After finishing the specific tests the diagnosis of malingering or functional visual loss should be unambiguous and the existing function should be determined. Strategies for further management are shown--dependent on the pathogenesis: the aim is to avoid repetition and to set the right course for the future. In case of malingering the reliable expert's report is helpful. In case of functional visual loss it is important to avoid unnecessary examinations and to offer specific aids.
诈病和功能性视力丧失的诊断应在排除诸如光学障碍、弱视、黄斑和视神经疾病早期以及皮质病变等鉴别诊断后,通过特定测试来证实。诈病和功能性视力丧失基于不同的病因和发病机制。然而,它们产生相同的症状,因此可以用相同的方法进行检查。该策略包括三个部分:1)检查结果的可重复性,2)特定程序:诱发反射反应、欺骗、用不同方法和客观方法测量相同功能,3)证明。在疑似双侧失明中,诱发反射和欺骗策略特别有用;在疑似双侧视力下降中,应用欺骗方法(与视标大小有关)、用其他方法(等同于视力)检查中心视力以及客观方法。在疑似单侧失明或视力下降中,双眼测试很有价值。此外,还使用诱发反射的方法,尤其是瞳孔反应,以及测量等同于视力的指标。在疑似视野同心性缩窄中,主要使用三种策略:1)检查视野大小是否与视角相符;2)用不同方法检查等视线;3)不同的视野计检查方法。在疑似偏盲性视野缺损的情况下,以下方法具有特殊价值:1)双眼检查;2)阅读能力;3)不同的视野计检查方法;4)半视野刺激。完成特定测试后,诈病或功能性视力丧失的诊断应明确无误,并应确定现有功能。根据发病机制展示了进一步管理的策略——目的是避免重复并为未来设定正确方向。对于诈病,可靠的专家报告很有帮助。对于功能性视力丧失,重要的是避免不必要的检查并提供特定辅助工具。