da Silveira Eduardo Almeida, Bubeck Kirstin A, Batista Edisleidy Rodriguez, Piat Perrine, Laverty Sheila, Beauchamp Guy, Archambault Marie, Elce Yvonne
Department of Clinical Sciences (da Silveira, Piat, Laverty, Elce), Department of Microbiology and Bacteriology (Archambault), Department of Pathology (Beauchamp), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 7C6; Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, 200 Westboro Road, North Grafton, Massachusetts 01536, USA (Bubeck); MAPAQ-LEPAQ-2, 2650, rue Einstein, Quebec, Quebec G1P 4S8 (Batista).
Can Vet J. 2016 Feb;57(2):164-8.
This prospective clinical study evaluates the effectiveness of an alcohol-based hand rub (Avagard™) for pre-surgical hand antisepsis in an equine hospital and compares it with traditional scrubbing technique using 4% chlorhexidine gluconate sponges and water. Prior to elective surgery, 3 board-certified surgeons were randomly assigned to hand antisepsis with either technique. Culture samples of each hand were taken at 4 times: before and after neutral soap hand wash, after scrub or rubbing technique, and after surgery. There was no significant difference in mean bacterial colony forming units between scrub and rub techniques over the 3 time periods (P = 0.6), controlling for initial counts. One horse from the scrub group had a skin incision infection following stifle arthroscopy; this was resolved with medical treatment. The alcohol-based hand rub is equivalent in efficacy for pre-surgical hand antisepsis to traditional water-based scrubs in an equine hospital setting.
这项前瞻性临床研究评估了一种酒精基手部消毒剂(Avagard™)在一家马医院用于术前手部消毒的有效性,并将其与使用4%葡萄糖酸氯己定海绵和水的传统刷洗技术进行比较。在择期手术前,3名获得委员会认证的外科医生被随机分配使用其中一种技术进行手部消毒。在4个时间点采集每只手的培养样本:中性肥皂洗手前、洗手后、刷洗或擦拭技术操作后以及手术后。在控制初始计数的情况下,在3个时间段内,刷洗和擦拭技术之间的平均细菌菌落形成单位没有显著差异(P = 0.6)。刷洗组的一匹马在膝关节镜检查后出现皮肤切口感染;经药物治疗后痊愈。在马医院环境中,酒精基手部消毒剂在术前手部消毒方面的效果与传统的水基刷洗相当。