Scharfman M A, Grad G J
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976 Apr;33(4):431-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770040013004.
An assumption has existed that training in a psychoanalytically or psychodynamically oriented residency program would narrow the range of the trainees' interests and limit career pathways with a predominance of private practice. In order to test this assumption, a survey was undertaken of graduates of a psychoanalytically oriented program over a ten-year period with a view to determining the nature of their present professional activities. Results of the survey were compared to available national statistics for patterns of psychiatric professional practice and prove the assumptions to be invalid. We discuss some implications of this study and possible alternate explanations for the professional practice patterns that have emerged.
有一种假设认为，在以精神分析或心理动力学为导向的住院医师培训项目中接受培训，会缩小受训者的兴趣范围，并限制职业道路，导致以私人执业为主。为了验证这一假设，我们对一个以精神分析为导向的项目在十年期间的毕业生进行了一项调查，旨在确定他们目前专业活动的性质。将调查结果与现有的全国精神病学专业实践模式统计数据进行了比较，结果证明该假设是无效的。我们讨论了这项研究的一些影响，以及对所出现的专业实践模式可能的其他解释。
