Kosoglou T, Radwanski E, Batra V K, Lim J M, Christopher D, Affrime M B
Clinical Pharmacology Department, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Clin Ther. 1997 Sep-Oct;19(5):1002-12. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80052-5.
The pharmacokinetic profiles of single and multiple doses of loratadine, descarboethoxyloratadine (DCL) (the major active metabolite of loratadine), and pseudoephedrine were determined in a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study in 24 healthy men. Subjects received a single dose (day 1) and multiple doses (days 3 to 10) of a once-daily (QD) formulation of loratadine 10 mg in an immediate-release coating and pseudoephedrine sulfate 240 mg in an extended-release core (CLAR-ITIN-D 24 HOUR tablets), and a twice-daily (BID) formulation of loratadine 5 mg in an immediate-release coating and pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg, with 60 mg in an immediate-release coating and 60 mg in the barrier-protected core (CLARITIN-D 12 HOUR tablets) in study sessions, each separated by a 10-day washout period. Both regimens were safe and well tolerated. On day 1, plasma loratadine, DCL, and pseudoephedrine concentrations were higher following the QD formulation than following the BID formulation, as expected. On day 10, loratadine and DCL maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values were, on average, 87% and 35% higher, respectively, for the QD formulation than for the BID formulation; however, the values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) for loratadine and DCL were equivalent (90% confidence interval [CI]: 83% to 110% for loratadine; 90% to 107% for DCL). On day 10, pseudoephedrine Cmax and AUC0-24 values were equivalent (90% CI for Cmax: 94% to 109%; for AUC: 91% to 106%) for the two formulations, and lower pseudoephedrine concentrations were observed from 16 to 24 hours with the QD formulation. Both loratadine/pseudoephedrine formulations produced equivalent loratadine and DCL AUC0-24 values and equivalent pseudoephedrine Cmax and AUC0-24 values following multiple dosing. The lower pseudoephedrine concentrations in the evening with the QD formulation may minimize the potential for insomnia in patients when compared with the BID formulation.
在一项针对24名健康男性的随机、开放标签、双向交叉研究中,测定了单剂量和多剂量氯雷他定、去乙氧氯雷他定(DCL,氯雷他定的主要活性代谢物)和伪麻黄碱的药代动力学特征。受试者接受了单剂量(第1天)和多剂量(第3至10天)的每日一次(QD)制剂,即10毫克氯雷他定速释包衣和240毫克硫酸伪麻黄碱缓释片芯(CLAR-ITIN-D 24小时片),以及每日两次(BID)制剂,即5毫克氯雷他定速释包衣和120毫克硫酸伪麻黄碱,其中60毫克为速释包衣,60毫克为屏障保护片芯(CLARITIN-D 12小时片),各研究阶段之间间隔10天的洗脱期。两种给药方案均安全且耐受性良好。如预期的那样,在第1天,QD制剂后的血浆氯雷他定、DCL和伪麻黄碱浓度高于BID制剂后的浓度。在第10天,QD制剂的氯雷他定和DCL的最大血浆浓度(Cmax)值分别比BID制剂平均高87%和35%;然而,氯雷他定和DCL的0至24小时血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-24)值相当(氯雷他定的90%置信区间[CI]:83%至110%;DCL的90%至107%)。在第10天,两种制剂的伪麻黄碱Cmax和AUC0-24值相当(Cmax的90% CI:94%至109%;AUC的90%至106%),并且在16至24小时观察到QD制剂的伪麻黄碱浓度较低。两种氯雷他定/伪麻黄碱制剂在多次给药后产生的氯雷他定和DCL的AUC0-24值相当,伪麻黄碱的Cmax和AUC0-24值也相当。与BID制剂相比,QD制剂在晚上的伪麻黄碱浓度较低,这可能会使患者失眠的可能性降至最低。