• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日一次服用氯雷他定 - 伪麻黄碱复方制剂与其单独成分及安慰剂相比治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性比较

Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus its components alone and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Bronsky E, Boggs P, Findlay S, Gawchik S, Georgitis J, Mansmann H, Sholler L, Wolfe J, Meltzer E, Morris R

机构信息

AAAA Medical Research Group, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995 Aug;96(2):139-47. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70001-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70001-3
PMID:7636050
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis often requires the use of a decongestant to improve nasal congestion, along with an antihistamine to adequately control other nasal, as well as nonnasal symptoms.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 874 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated with one of the following: SCH 434 QD (a combination of 10 mg of loratadine in the coating and 240 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate in an extended-release core) once daily, 10 mg of loratadine once daily, 120 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate every 12 hours, or placebo for 2 weeks.

RESULTS

SCH 434 QD was consistently superior to placebo in controlling the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Composite symptom scores (total, total nasal, and total nonnasal) were reduced significantly in patients treated with SCH 434 QD as compared with placebo (p < 0.01). When compared with its individual components, reductions in mean symptom scores were consistently greater, numerically, in patients treated with SCH 434 QD than in patients who were treated with either loratadine or pseudoephedrine alone. SCH 434 QD was superior to pseudoephedrine in reducing nonnasal symptoms at all time points (p < 0.01), and superior to loratadine in relieving nasal stuffiness at end point (p < 0.01). In the physicians' evaluation of therapeutic response, the SCH 434 QD group had the greatest number of patients with a good or excellent response at end point (58%). All treatments were generally well tolerated with no serious or unusual adverse events. Insomnia and nervousness, adverse events commonly associated with pseudoephedrine, were noted in a significantly greater number of patients treated with SCH 434 QD or pseudoephedrine (p < or = 0.04) as compared with those treated with loratadine or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study demonstrate that SCH 434 QD is more effective than placebo or either of its components alone in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

摘要

背景

季节性变应性鼻炎症状的治疗通常需要使用减充血剂来改善鼻充血,同时使用抗组胺药来充分控制其他鼻部及非鼻部症状。

方法

在这项双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究中,874例中重度季节性变应性鼻炎症状患者接受以下治疗之一:SCH 434 QD(包衣中含10 mg氯雷他定和缓释核心中含240 mg硫酸伪麻黄碱的复方制剂)每日1次,氯雷他定10 mg每日1次,硫酸伪麻黄碱120 mg每12小时1次,或安慰剂,疗程2周。

结果

在控制季节性变应性鼻炎症状方面,SCH 434 QD始终优于安慰剂。与安慰剂相比,接受SCH 434 QD治疗的患者综合症状评分(总计、鼻部总计和非鼻部总计)显著降低(p < 0.01)。与单一成分相比,接受SCH 434 QD治疗的患者平均症状评分的降低在数值上始终大于单独接受氯雷他定或伪麻黄碱治疗的患者。在所有时间点,SCH 434 QD在减轻非鼻部症状方面优于伪麻黄碱(p < 0.01),在终点时缓解鼻阻塞方面优于氯雷他定(p < 0.01)。在医生对治疗反应的评估中,SCH 434 QD组在终点时有良好或优秀反应的患者数量最多(58%)。所有治疗总体耐受性良好,未出现严重或异常不良事件。与接受氯雷他定或安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受SCH 434 QD或伪麻黄碱治疗的患者中出现失眠和紧张(通常与伪麻黄碱相关的不良事件)的人数显著更多(p ≤ 0.04)。

结论

研究结果表明,在治疗季节性变应性鼻炎方面,SCH 434 QD比安慰剂或其单一成分更有效。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus its components alone and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.每日一次服用氯雷他定 - 伪麻黄碱复方制剂与其单独成分及安慰剂相比治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性比较
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995 Aug;96(2):139-47. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70001-3.
2
SCH 434: a new antihistamine/decongestant for seasonal allergic rhinitis.SCH 434:一种用于季节性过敏性鼻炎的新型抗组胺/减充血剂。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Jun;83(6):1083-90. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90450-8.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of once-daily versus twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combinations versus placebo in seasonal allergic rhinitis.氯雷他定-伪麻黄碱一日一次与一日两次联合用药对比安慰剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效及安全性比较
Am J Ther. 1998 Jul;5(4):245-51. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199807000-00007.
4
Comparison of the combinations of fexofenadine-pseudoephedrine and loratadine-montelukast in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.非索非那定-伪麻黄碱与氯雷他定-孟鲁司特联合用药治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的比较。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Jan;92(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61713-9.
5
Efficacy and safety of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine tablet, 2.5/120 mg two times a day, versus individual components in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.2.5/120毫克地氯雷他定/伪麻黄碱片每日两次与各单一成分治疗季节性变应性鼻炎患者的疗效和安全性比较
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2005 Sep-Oct;26(5):391-6.
6
Efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine vs the individual components in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.地氯雷他定和伪麻黄碱缓释制剂与单一成分治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性比较
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Mar;94(3):348-54. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60986-6.
7
Comparative study of SCH 434 and CTM-D in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.SCH 434与中药复方D治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的对比研究。
Clin Ther. 1994 Jan-Feb;16(1):50-6.
8
Efficacy and safety of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine combination vs its components in seasonal allergic rhinitis.地氯雷他定/伪麻黄碱复方制剂与其各成分治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性比较
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2009;19(2):117-24.
9
Onset-of-action for antihistamine and decongestant combinations during an outdoor challenge.户外激发试验中抗组胺药和解充血药组合的起效时间。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 Apr;84(4):451-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62280-6.
10
Efficacy and safety of loratadine plus pseudoephedrine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Dec;100(6 Pt 1):781-8. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70274-4.

引用本文的文献

1
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:变应性鼻炎。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Feb;8(2):108-352. doi: 10.1002/alr.22073.
2
Rupatadine: pharmacological profile and its use in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.卢帕他定:药理特性及其在过敏性鼻炎治疗中的应用。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Dec;61(4):320-32. doi: 10.1007/s12070-009-0091-8. Epub 2010 Jan 9.
3
Hay fever in adolescents and adults.青少年和成人的花粉热
BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Nov 18;2009:0509.
4
Treatment of congestion in upper respiratory diseases.治疗上呼吸道疾病引起的充血。
Int J Gen Med. 2010 Apr 8;3:69-91. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s8184.
5
A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination with that of a twice-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.一项随机、双盲、平行组研究,比较每日一次氯雷他定-伪麻黄碱复方制剂与每日两次氯雷他定-伪麻黄碱复方制剂治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep;264(9):1019-25. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0316-y. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
6
Grading the severity of allergic rhinitis for treatment strategy and drug study purposes.为治疗策略和药物研究目的对过敏性鼻炎的严重程度进行分级。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2001 May;1(3):235-41. doi: 10.1007/s11882-001-0010-x.
7
Impact of allergic rhinitis treatment on quality of life.过敏性鼻炎治疗对生活质量的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(9):891-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119090-00001.
8
Loratadine-pseudoephedrine in children with allergic rhinitis, a controlled double-blind trial.氯雷他定 - 伪麻黄碱治疗儿童过敏性鼻炎的对照双盲试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Feb;45(2):147-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00657.x.