Suppr超能文献

门诊胸腔引流管管理

Outpatient chest tube management.

作者信息

Ponn R B, Silverman H J, Federico J A

机构信息

Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hospital of St. Raphael, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Nov;64(5):1437-40. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00853-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with indwelling chest tubes inserted for the purpose of evacuating pleural air traditionally are treated in the hospital. The current emphasis on cost-effective medical care and a recent report describing the early discharge of patients who had undergone lung volume reduction operations and had a persistent air leak prompted us to review our overall experience with outpatient tubes in a general thoracic surgical practice.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients who had been discharged from the hospital with chest tubes and Heimlich valves in place for venting pleural air over the past 7 years. Ambulatory tube management was used on a total of 240 occasions in three diagnostic groups: pneumothorax (176 cases), prolonged postresection air leak (45 cases), and outpatient thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge excision (19 cases). Failure was defined as hospital admission for complications of tube insertion or function.

RESULTS

There were 10 failures in the entire group (4.2%), 4.5% for pneumothorax, 2% for postresection air leak, and 5.3% for outpatient thoracoscopy. There were no deaths or instances of life-threatening problems. The cost of at least 1,263 inpatient hospital days was saved.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a chest tube, with or without an air leak, does not always require hospitalization. Admission can be avoided in most patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax and in selected patients with pneumothorax of other causes. The postoperative hospital stay can be shortened for many patients who have a prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection. Ambulatory tube management also makes feasible outpatient thoracoscopy for noneffusive processes.

摘要

背景

传统上,因排出胸腔气体而插入留置胸管的患者在医院接受治疗。当前对具有成本效益的医疗护理的重视以及最近一份描述接受肺减容手术且持续漏气患者早期出院的报告促使我们回顾我们在普通胸外科实践中门诊胸管的总体经验。

方法

我们回顾了过去7年中出院时带有胸管和海姆利希瓣膜以排出胸腔气体的患者记录。在三个诊断组中总共240次采用门诊胸管管理:气胸(176例)、切除术后长期漏气(45例)和门诊胸腔镜肺楔形切除术(19例)。失败定义为因胸管插入或功能并发症而住院。

结果

整个组中有10例失败(4.2%),气胸组为4.5%,切除术后漏气组为2%,门诊胸腔镜组为5.3%。没有死亡或危及生命问题的情况。至少节省了1263个住院日的费用。

结论

无论有无漏气,胸管的存在并不总是需要住院治疗。大多数原发性自发性气胸患者以及某些其他原因导致气胸的患者可以避免住院。对于肺切除术后长期漏气的许多患者,术后住院时间可以缩短。门诊胸管管理也使无积液情况的门诊胸腔镜检查变得可行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验