Suppr超能文献

湿润烧伤膏与碘伏软膏治疗重度烧伤的疗效评价

[Evaluation of therapeutic effects of moist burn ointment and betadine ointment in treatment of severe burn].

作者信息

Zheng S, Li T, Chen W

机构信息

1st Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1996 Nov;12(6):437-9.

PMID:9387435
Abstract

In order to compare the therapeutic value of moist burn ointment (MBO) and betadine ointment in severe burns, the authors divided 30 patients with burn over 30% TBSA into two groups. In one group MBO was used, and in another group betadine was used. The result showed; 1. The difference between two groups was not great in superficial II degree burn wound. 2. MBO was less effective than betadine in deep burn wound. MBO had little antibacterial effect, wound healing was delayed, and incidences of infection, complication and mortality were higher. At the same time, MBO did not have noticeable effect in inhibiting scar hypertrophy. The authors suggest that MBO must be used with caution in severe burn patients, especially in the southern provinces where the climate is hot and humid.

摘要

为比较湿润烧伤膏(MBO)与碘伏软膏对重度烧伤的治疗价值,作者将30例烧伤面积超过30%体表面积的患者分为两组。一组使用MBO,另一组使用碘伏。结果显示:1. 浅Ⅱ度烧伤创面两组差异不大。2. 在深度烧伤创面,MBO的效果不如碘伏。MBO抗菌作用小,伤口愈合延迟,感染、并发症及死亡率较高。同时,MBO在抑制瘢痕增生方面效果不明显。作者建议,重度烧伤患者使用MBO须谨慎,尤其是在气候炎热潮湿的南方省份。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验