Rosebraugh C J, Speer A J, Solomon D J, Szauter K E, Ainsworth M A, Holden M D, Lieberman S A, Clyburn E B
Division of General Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas Medical School at Galveston, 77555-0772, USA.
Acad Med. 1997 Nov;72(11):1012-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199711000-00022.
To evaluate whether written standards increase the reproducibility of a physician-facilitated station in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) designed to assess history, physical-examination, and communication skills.
The OSCE examination at the University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston consists of ten eight-minute stations. Six of these stations consist of three History, Physical-examination, Problem-solving, and Plan (HPPP) station pairs. Each existing clinical-problem HPPP station was given to two content experts to develop standards for faculty rating scales appropriate for the evaluation of third-year medical students. Three pairs of faculty members were used to determine interrater reliability by scoring videotapes of three HPPP stations' presentation and problem-solving components. Faculty pairs scored tapes of 15 students without using standards and tapes of 15 students using the standards developed. Differences between the reliabilities without and with the standards were tested for significance using Fisher's R to Z transformation. The reproducibility and standard error of measurement (SEM) were extrapolated for increasing amounts of testing time. The HPPP component scores were also correlated with the written examination scores and preceptors' ratings. Data were obtained from the three HPPP stations used in the 1995-96 internal medicine clerkship SP examination.
In all, 196 students completed the OSCE examination. The standards developed improved interrater reliability and reached statistical significance (p < .01) for one HPPP station. Reproducibility for the presentation and problem-solving components of the HPPP stations were > .80 after five hours of testing. The problem-solving component correlated at .37 and .19 with written examinations and with ward grades, respectively.
The data from this study suggest that standards increase the reproducibility of presentation and problem-solving components of an OSCE to a level as high as, or higher than, that associated with the history, physical-examination, and communication components of traditional standardized-patient examinations.
评估在旨在评估病史、体格检查和沟通技巧的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中,书面标准是否能提高由医师辅助的考站的可重复性。
德克萨斯大学医学分部加尔维斯顿分校的OSCE考试由10个8分钟的考站组成。其中6个考站由3对病史、体格检查、问题解决和计划(HPPP)考站组成。每个现有的临床问题HPPP考站由两名内容专家制定适用于评估三年级医学生的教师评分量表标准。使用三对教师通过对三个HPPP考站的展示和问题解决部分的录像进行评分来确定评分者间的可靠性。教师对15名学生不使用标准时的录像和使用所制定标准时的15名学生的录像进行评分。使用Fisher's R到Z转换检验不使用标准和使用标准时可靠性之间的差异是否具有显著性。针对增加的测试时间外推测量的可重复性和标准误差(SEM)。HPPP部分的分数也与书面考试分数和带教教师的评分相关。数据来自1995 - 96年内科实习SP考试中使用的三个HPPP考站。
共有196名学生完成了OSCE考试。所制定的标准提高了评分者间的可靠性,并且对于一个HPPP考站达到了统计学显著性(p < .01)。经过5小时的测试,HPPP考站的展示和问题解决部分的可重复性> .80。问题解决部分与书面考试和病房成绩的相关性分别为.37和.19。
本研究的数据表明,标准可将OSCE的展示和问题解决部分的可重复性提高到与传统标准化患者考试的病史、体格检查和沟通部分相关的水平一样高或更高。