Ducci M, Appetecchia M, Marzetti M
Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, Regina Elena Institute for Cancer Research, Rome, Italy.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Sep;16(3):333-5.
In papillary thyroid carcinoma lymphnode metastases at presentation do not seem to adversely affect survival, but do increase the risk of loco-regional tumor recurrence. The value of systematic versus selective lymphadenectomy is far less standardized, whereas the role of postoperative radioiodine in preventing either nodal recurrence or cancer death remains controversial. Clinical data of 36 N+ patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who had undergone from 1990 to 1996 ipsilateral or bilateral neck dissection were retrospectively reviewed, to analyse the value of systematic lymphadenectomy. In our series of 50 extensive lymph node dissections (levels 2-6), the number of metastases in each specimen (mean value: 5) and the incidence of multiple level metastases (36%) were high. In 37.5% of the metastases at level 6 and in 11.1% at level 4, coexisting nodal involvement at level 2 was observed, without metastasization at intermediate levels. Multiple levels metastases and skip metastases were present in at least one third of the patients and could be excised only performing a complete dissection of the levels 2-6. Extra-capsular spread was found in 56% of the specimens. In 64.3% of these cases a functional neck dissection was performed. A modified radical or radical neck dissection was carried out in the other 35.7% of the cases. These patients received modified radical neck dissection (functional dissection with sacrifice of internal jugular vein) in 60% of the cases and radical neck dissection in the other 40%. In papillary thyroid carcinoma extensive lymphnode dissection at presentation has been stated to offer no advantage versus selective lymphadenectomy, causing increased morbidity. However, experienced surgeons report a low incidence (less than 5%) of accessory spinal nerve and cervical plexus permanent sequelae after functional neck dissection. In our opinion, patients with cervical lymph node metastases require a complete loco-regional neck dissection. Systematic lymphadenectomy, performed by lateral neck plus upper anterior mediastinal dissection, can yield a high disease-free survival. Moreover, this can limit the overall radio-iodine therapeutic dose and the risk of de-differentiation of recurrent tumor to the anaplastic type in patients with a long-term and near normal life-span.
在乳头状甲状腺癌中,就诊时出现的淋巴结转移似乎对生存率没有不利影响,但确实会增加局部区域肿瘤复发的风险。系统性淋巴结清扫与选择性淋巴结清扫的价值远未标准化,而术后放射性碘在预防淋巴结复发或癌症死亡方面的作用仍存在争议。回顾性分析了1990年至1996年间接受同侧或双侧颈部清扫术的36例N+乳头状甲状腺癌患者的临床资料,以分析系统性淋巴结清扫的价值。在我们这一系列50例广泛淋巴结清扫术(2-6区)中,每个标本中的转移灶数量(平均值:5个)以及多区域转移的发生率(36%)都很高。在6区37.5%的转移灶和4区11.1%的转移灶中,观察到2区同时存在淋巴结受累,中间区域无转移。至少三分之一的患者存在多区域转移和跳跃转移,只有通过完整清扫2-6区才能切除。56%的标本发现有包膜外扩散。其中64.3%的病例进行了功能性颈部清扫。另外35.7%的病例进行了改良根治性或根治性颈部清扫。这些患者中60%的病例接受了改良根治性颈部清扫(牺牲颈内静脉的功能性清扫),另外40%接受了根治性颈部清扫。对于乳头状甲状腺癌,就诊时进行广泛淋巴结清扫与选择性淋巴结清扫相比并无优势,反而会增加发病率。然而,经验丰富的外科医生报告称,功能性颈部清扫术后副脊神经和颈丛永久性后遗症的发生率较低(低于5%)。我们认为,有颈部淋巴结转移的患者需要进行完整的局部区域颈部清扫。通过侧颈部加上上前纵隔清扫进行的系统性淋巴结清扫,可以获得较高的无病生存率。此外,这可以限制总体放射性碘治疗剂量以及长期且生活接近正常的患者中复发性肿瘤向间变性类型去分化的风险。