Suppr超能文献

一项双盲交叉研究,比较单独使用预防性静脉注射格拉司琼或联合地塞米松作为止吐治疗,以控制与化疗相关的恶心和呕吐。

A double-blind crossover study comparing prophylactic intravenous granisetron alone or in combination with dexamethasone as antiemetic treatment in controlling nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy.

作者信息

Kirchner V, Aapro M, Terrey J P, Alberto P

机构信息

Division of Haemato-Oncology, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire Genéve, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 1997 Sep;33(10):1605-10. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00160-3.

Abstract

The efficacies of granisetron plus dexamethasone and granisetron alone in controlling nausea and vomiting during two consecutive cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy given for up to 5 days were compared in a two-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. In all, 110 evaluable patients received either dexamethasone, 20 mg i.v., or matching placebo, plus open-label granisetron, 3 mg i.v., given on each chemotherapy day. At cycle 2, patients crossed over to the alternative treatment; 72 patients completed the crossover. In these 72 patients, the complete response rates over 24 h for granisetron plus dexamethasone and granisetron plus placebo in cycle 1 were 87% and 70% (ns), respectively. In cycle 2 the complete response rates over 24 h were 73% and 62% (ns). Combining the two cycles, the complete response rates over 24 h were 80.6% (granisetron plus dexamethasone) and 65.3% (granisetron plus placebo; P = 0.015). Granisetron plus dexamethasone was significantly more effective in terms of times to less than complete response (P = 0.041), to first episode of moderate/severe nausea (P = 0.04), to first episode of vomiting (0.03) and to use of rescue medication (P = 0.02). Adverse events tended to be minor, with asthenia and insomnia the most common. Of those patients who expressed a preference, 67% preferred granisetron plus dexamethasone (P < 0.05). A single dose of dexamethasone added to granisetron thus enhances the efficacy of granisetron alone in preventing nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

摘要

在一项双中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉研究中,比较了格拉司琼加地塞米松与单用格拉司琼在长达5天的两个连续周期中度致吐性化疗期间控制恶心和呕吐的疗效。共有110例可评估患者在每个化疗日接受静脉注射20 mg地塞米松或匹配的安慰剂,加开放标签的静脉注射3 mg格拉司琼。在第2周期,患者交叉接受另一种治疗;72例患者完成了交叉治疗。在这72例患者中,第1周期格拉司琼加地塞米松和格拉司琼加安慰剂24小时的完全缓解率分别为87%和70%(无统计学差异)。第2周期24小时的完全缓解率分别为73%和62%(无统计学差异)。合并两个周期,24小时的完全缓解率分别为80.6%(格拉司琼加地塞米松)和65.3%(格拉司琼加安慰剂;P = 0.015)。在达到不完全缓解的时间(P = 0.041)、首次出现中度/重度恶心的时间(P = 0.04)、首次出现呕吐的时间(0.03)和使用解救药物的时间(P = 0.02)方面,格拉司琼加地塞米松明显更有效。不良事件往往较轻,最常见的是乏力和失眠。在表示有偏好的患者中,67%更喜欢格拉司琼加地塞米松(P < 0.05)。因此,在格拉司琼基础上加用单剂量地塞米松可增强其在中度致吐性化疗后预防恶心和呕吐的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验