Suppr超能文献

格拉司琼联合地塞米松或单独使用地塞米松对接受高致吐性化疗患者延迟性恶心和呕吐的控制:一项双盲、安慰剂对照的比较研究。

Control of delayed nausea and vomiting with granisetron plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study.

作者信息

Goedhals L, Heron J F, Kleisbauer J P, Pagani O, Sessa C

机构信息

Department of Oncotherapy, National Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 1998 Jun;9(6):661-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1008256115221.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacies of granisetron plus dexamethasone and dexamethasone alone in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting after cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 69 mg/m2) were compared in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 654 patients (of whom 619 were evaluable) received prophylactic granisetron plus dexamethasone before chemotherapy on day 0; on day 1 complete responders and non-responders were randomized separately to receive dexamethasone, 8 mg b.d. p.o., with either granisetron, 1 mg b.d. p.o., or matching placebo for six days.

RESULTS

Over days 1-6 the complete response rates were 54.5% (dexamethasone group) and 52.1% (dexamethasone plus granisetron group). Response rates were higher over days 4-6 (71.8% and 70.7%, respectively) than over days 1-3 (60.4% and 57.9%, respectively). Significantly more patients who responded to antiemetic treatment during day 0 were responders over days 1-6 (63% vs. 17%; P < 0.001). No other treatment-related differences were found. Adverse events tended to be minor, with constipation and headache the most common. Overall, there were no significant differences in the safety profiles of the two regimens, but constipation and abdominal pain were significantly more common in the dexamethasone plus granisetron group.

CONCLUSIONS

Granisetron plus dexamethasone did not appear to confer additional benefit over use of dexamethasone alone in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting following cisplatin chemotherapy. Control of acute nausea and vomiting, however, appeared to be an important factor influencing delayed nausea and vomiting.

摘要

背景

在一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照的比较研究中,比较了格拉司琼加地塞米松与单独使用地塞米松在控制顺铂化疗(≥69mg/m²)后延迟性恶心和呕吐方面的疗效。

患者与方法

总共654例患者(其中619例可评估)在第0天化疗前接受预防性格拉司琼加地塞米松治疗;在第1天,完全缓解者和未缓解者分别随机接受地塞米松,8mg,每日两次,口服,同时服用格拉司琼,1mg,每日两次,口服,或匹配的安慰剂,持续6天。

结果

在第1 - 6天,完全缓解率分别为54.5%(地塞米松组)和52.1%(地塞米松加格拉司琼组)。第4 - 6天的缓解率(分别为71.8%和70.7%)高于第1 - 3天(分别为60.4%和57.9%)。在第0天对止吐治疗有反应的患者中,在第1 - 6天仍有反应的患者显著更多(63%对17%;P < 0.001)。未发现其他与治疗相关的差异。不良事件往往较轻,便秘和头痛最为常见。总体而言,两种治疗方案的安全性概况无显著差异,但便秘和腹痛在地塞米松加格拉司琼组中明显更常见。

结论

在控制顺铂化疗后的延迟性恶心和呕吐方面,格拉司琼加地塞米松似乎并未比单独使用地塞米松带来额外益处。然而,控制急性恶心和呕吐似乎是影响延迟性恶心和呕吐的一个重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验