• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑和芬太尼持续输注新方案的有效性与安全性及其对电生理研究期间患者痛苦的影响。

Efficacy and safety of a new protocol for continuous infusion of midazolam and fentanyl and its effects on patient distress during electrophysiological studies.

作者信息

Kovoor P, Porter R, Uther J B, Ross D L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Nov;20(11):2765-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05434.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05434.x
PMID:9392807
Abstract

Electrophysiological studies are often distressing for patients. We devised a regime of continuous infusion of midazolam and fentanyl during electrophysiological studies without the presence of a specialist anaesthetist. The effects on key hemodynamic and respiratory variables and level of sedation were evaluated in detail in the first 775 patients. The safety of this practice was evaluated in 1,344 consecutive patients. Doses were calculated according to patients' weight and age. A mean total dose of 26 mg of midazolam and 115 mcg of fentanyl were infused. Satisfactory sedation was achieved in 97% of patients. The mean duration of procedure was 188 +/- 90 minutes. Complete amnesia of the procedure was obtained in 87% of patients. Sedation caused clinically insignificant changes in respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2 and blood pressure. There were no major complications related to sedation. Upper airway obstruction, usually minor, occurred in 42% and some restlessness in 20% of sedated patients. The assistance of a specialist anesthetist was required in 0.3% of sedated patients for management of restlessness, hypoventilation, or obstructive sleep apnea. The amount of distress experienced by sedated patients (n = 775) was significantly less compared to a previous series of nonsedated patients (n = 775) undergoing electrophysiological studies (P < 0.001). The degree of distress experienced by patients during electrophysiological studies can be reduced significantly by sedation with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl. Continuous infusion is an efficient, safe, and effective way of administering midazolam and fentanyl.

摘要

电生理检查对患者来说常常令人痛苦。我们设计了一种在没有专科麻醉医生在场的情况下,在电生理检查期间持续输注咪达唑仑和芬太尼的方案。在最初的775例患者中,详细评估了其对关键血流动力学和呼吸变量以及镇静水平的影响。在1344例连续患者中评估了这种做法的安全性。剂量根据患者的体重和年龄计算。咪达唑仑的平均总输注剂量为26毫克,芬太尼为115微克。97%的患者实现了满意的镇静。手术的平均持续时间为188±90分钟。87%的患者对手术过程完全失忆。镇静导致呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、呼气末二氧化碳分压和血压出现临床上无显著意义的变化。没有与镇静相关的重大并发症。上呼吸道梗阻通常较轻,在42%的镇静患者中出现,20%的镇静患者出现一些躁动。0.3%的镇静患者需要专科麻醉医生协助处理躁动、通气不足或阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。与之前一系列接受电生理检查的未镇静患者(n = 775)相比,镇静患者(n = 775)所经历的痛苦程度显著降低(P < 0.001)。静脉注射咪达唑仑和芬太尼镇静可显著降低患者在电生理检查期间所经历的痛苦程度。持续输注是一种有效、安全且高效的给予咪达唑仑和芬太尼的方式。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of a new protocol for continuous infusion of midazolam and fentanyl and its effects on patient distress during electrophysiological studies.咪达唑仑和芬太尼持续输注新方案的有效性与安全性及其对电生理研究期间患者痛苦的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Nov;20(11):2765-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05434.x.
2
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of deep sedation for electrophysiology procedures administered in the absence of an anesthetist.在无麻醉师情况下进行电生理手术时深度镇静的安全性和有效性评估。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jul;20(7):1808-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb03571.x.
3
An outcome study comparing intravenous sedation with midazolam/fentanyl (conscious sedation) versus propofol infusion (deep sedation) for aesthetic surgery.一项比较咪达唑仑/芬太尼静脉镇静(清醒镇静)与丙泊酚输注(深度镇静)用于美容手术的结局研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1683-9; discussion 1690-1. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000086363.34535.A4.
4
Safety of intravenous midazolam and fentanyl for pediatric GI endoscopy: prospective study of 1578 endoscopies.静脉注射咪达唑仑和芬太尼用于儿科胃肠内镜检查的安全性:1578例内镜检查的前瞻性研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Feb;65(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.002.
5
Conscious sedation during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: a feasibility and safety study.心房颤动冷冻球囊消融术中的清醒镇静:一项可行性和安全性研究。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2018 Apr;66(2):143-151. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4725.17.04505-4. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
6
Comparing efficacy and safety of four intravenous sedation regimens in dental outpatients.比较四种静脉镇静方案在牙科门诊患者中的疗效和安全性。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Jun;132(6):740-51. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0271.
7
Cardiac electrophysiologic effects of midazolam combined with fentanyl.咪达唑仑联合芬太尼的心脏电生理效应
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Jul 15;72(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90156-7.
8
Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country.在一个发展中国家的大型三级转诊中心进行小儿胃肠内镜检查静脉镇静的经验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Aug;19(8):784-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03063.x.
9
Sedative and ventilatory effects of midazolam infusion: effect of flumazenil reversal.咪达唑仑输注的镇静和通气作用:氟马西尼逆转的效果。
Can J Anaesth. 1995 Aug;42(8):677-84. doi: 10.1007/BF03012664.
10
Efficiency of propofol versus midazolam and fentanyl sedation at a pediatric teaching hospital: a prospective study.小儿教学医院中丙泊酚与咪达唑仑和芬太尼镇静效果的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1067-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.038. Epub 2008 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The importance of anaesthesia in atrial fibrillation ablation: Comparing conscious sedation with general anaesthesia.麻醉在心房颤动消融术中的重要性:清醒镇静与全身麻醉的比较。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2023 Mar-Apr;23(2):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
2
Sedation in the Electrophysiology Laboratory: A Multidisciplinary Review.电生理实验室中的镇静:多学科综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003629. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003629.
3
Electrophysiological features in patients with sinus node dysfunction and vasovagal syncope.
窦房结功能障碍与血管迷走性晕厥患者的电生理特征。
Arch Med Sci. 2011 Dec 31;7(6):963-70. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2011.26607. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
4
Intravenous sedation for cardiac procedures can be administered safely and cost-effectively by non-anesthesia personnel.心脏手术的静脉镇静可由非麻醉人员安全且经济高效地实施。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Jan;21(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10840-007-9191-0. Epub 2008 Feb 14.