Cole D J, Wilson M C, Rivoltini L, Custer M, Nishimura M I
Department of Surgery and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
Cancer Res. 1997 Dec 1;57(23):5320-7.
Characterization of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) recognized by CTLs makes the consideration of therapeutic strategies based on peptide stimulation of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) feasible. Several such approaches are adoptive transfer of peptide-stimulated PBLs, ex vivo peptide stimulation of dendritic cells, and direct vaccination with TAA-derived peptides. A critical component of any of these peptide-based strategies is the requirement that the patient's PBLs are able to react productively against the presented TAA. The purpose of this study, through the study of T-cell receptor (TCR) usage, was to evaluate the T-cell response in matched MART-1(27-35) peptide-stimulated PBLs and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). MART-1(27-35)-reactive PBL and TIL cultures were generated from three patients by in vitro stimulation with an immunodominant peptide of MART-1 (MART-1(27-35)). All cultures had a human leukocyte antigen A2-restricted, MART-1(27-35)-specific CTL response. The TCR usage of each was assessed by the DNA sequence analysis of 50 TCR beta clones obtained by rapid amplification of cDNA ends per culture. TCR analysis suggests a TCR repertoire that differed from patient to patient (8-16 subfamilies were used) and a predominant usage of a different variable beta chain (BV) by each of these MART-reactive T cells. These predominant BV rearrangements were derived from multiple clonotypes because different variable, diversity, and junctional regions were observed. However, a similar pattern of expansion was present for both PBLs and TILs; the relative usage of each prevailing BV was more marked in TILs (36, 50, and 78% of TILs versus 26, 20, and 24% of PBLs, respectively), a broader TCR repertoire was used by PBLs (P > 0.05), and similar TCR subfamily usage was noted when TIL and PBL cultures from the same patient were compared (8 of 11, 7 of 9, and 7 of 8 for patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Furthermore, the exact same clonotypes derived from predominant TCR subfamilies in the PBLs and TILs were present in each patient, suggesting peptide-stimulated expansion in both biological compartments. These studies suggest that there will not be a limited and predictable TCR subfamily response to a specific TAA, although reproducible patterns of PBL and TIL expansion are present from patient to patient. Additionally, identical T-cell clonotypes having the same potential for antigen-driven expansion were present in a patient's PBLs and TILs. As such, our data support the conceptualization of approaches using adoptive transfer or vaccination based on TAA-derived peptide stimulation of PBLs.
对细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)识别的肿瘤相关抗原(TAA)进行表征,使得基于外周血淋巴细胞(PBL)肽刺激的治疗策略的考虑变得可行。几种这样的方法包括肽刺激的PBL的过继转移、树突状细胞的体外肽刺激以及用TAA衍生肽直接接种疫苗。这些基于肽的策略中的任何一种的关键组成部分是要求患者的PBL能够有效地针对所呈现的TAA作出反应。本研究的目的是通过研究T细胞受体(TCR)的使用情况,评估在匹配的MART-1(27-35)肽刺激的PBL和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)中的T细胞反应。通过用MART-1的免疫显性肽(MART-1(27-35))进行体外刺激,从三名患者中产生了MART-1(27-35)反应性PBL和TIL培养物。所有培养物都具有人白细胞抗原A2限制的、MART-1(27-35)特异性CTL反应。通过对每个培养物通过cDNA末端快速扩增获得的50个TCRβ克隆进行DNA序列分析,评估每个培养物的TCR使用情况。TCR分析表明,不同患者的TCR库不同(使用了8-16个亚家族),并且这些MART反应性T细胞中的每一个都主要使用不同的可变β链(BV)。这些主要的BV重排源自多个克隆型,因为观察到了不同的可变区、多样性区和连接区。然而,PBL和TIL存在相似的扩增模式;每种主要BV的相对使用在TIL中更明显(分别为TIL的36%、50%和78%,而PBL为26%、20%和24%),PBL使用的TCR库更广泛(P>0.05),并且当比较同一患者的TIL和PBL培养物时,观察到相似的TCR亚家族使用情况(患者1、2和3分别为11个中的8个、9个中的7个和8个中的7个)。此外,每个患者的PBL和TIL中存在源自主要TCR亚家族的完全相同的克隆型,表明在两个生物学隔室中都有肽刺激的扩增。这些研究表明,尽管不同患者之间存在PBL和TIL扩增的可重复模式,但对特定TAA不会有有限且可预测的TCR亚家族反应。此外,患者的PBL和TIL中存在具有相同抗原驱动扩增潜力的相同T细胞克隆型。因此,我们的数据支持基于TAA衍生肽刺激PBL的过继转移或接种疫苗方法的概念。