• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环孢素治疗急性重症溃疡性结肠炎患者的短期和长期疗效。比利时炎症性肠病研究组

Short- and long-term efficacy of cyclosporin administration in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Belgian IBD Group.

作者信息

Van Gossum A, Schmit A, Adler M, Chioccioli C, Fiasse R, Louwagie P, D'Haens G, Rutgeerts P, De Vos M, Reynaert H, Devis G, Belaiche J, Van Outryve M

机构信息

Université Libre de Bruxelles.

出版信息

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1997 Jul-Sep;60(3):197-200.

PMID:9396174
Abstract

Cyclosporin (CsA) has been proposed in the management of patients with acute ulcerative colitis (UC) in whom standard therapy failed and who were candidates for colectomy. Seven academic hospitals contributed to this retrospective study that included 29 patients (median age: 33 y. (15-74 y.); 12 females and 17 males). The median duration of the disease was 4 y. (0.3 to 33 y.). Before initiating CsA, patients were unresponsive to treatment including i.v. corticosteroids (n = 29), 5-ASA or salazopyrine (n = 19), azathioprine (n = 3), antibiotics (n = 14). The i.v. mean dose was 4 mg/kg/day and was adapted to blood level. Concomitant treatment included corticosteroids (n = 27). The median duration of i.v. CsA administration was 10 days (4 to 41 days). At the end of CsA administration, a global improvement was described in 20 patients while a surgery had to be performed immediately in 8 patients because of exacerbation of symptoms (n = 7) or perforation (n = 1). One other patient (74 y.) died because of Pneumocystis carinii infection. For the responders, maintenance therapy included: tapering dose of steroids (n = 12), azathioprine (n = 12), 5-ASA or salazopyrine (n = 10), methotrexate (n = 1) or oral CsA (n = II). The median duration of follow-up was 12 months (4 to 48 months). Among the 20 responders, 7 were subsequently referred for colectomy either electively (n = 3) or because of recurrence of the disease (n = 4). Among the 12 patients treated by azathioprine as a maintenance therapy, only 3 had to be referred for surgery (25%). Among the 8 patients who did not receive azathioprine, 4 were subsequently referred for a colectomy (50%) (NS). In patients with acute refractory UC who received CsA, the short-term efficacy (avoidance of immediate colectomy) was obtained in 20 out of 29 patients (69%). However, after a median follow-up of 12 months, only 13 patients were colectomy free (45%).

摘要

环孢素(CsA)已被用于治疗标准治疗失败且有结肠切除术指征的急性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者。七家学术医院参与了这项回顾性研究,该研究纳入了29例患者(中位年龄:33岁(15 - 74岁);女性12例,男性17例)。疾病的中位病程为4年(0.3至33年)。在开始使用CsA之前,患者对包括静脉注射皮质类固醇(n = 29)、5 - 氨基水杨酸或柳氮磺胺吡啶(n = 19)、硫唑嘌呤(n = 3)、抗生素(n = 14)在内的治疗均无反应。静脉注射的平均剂量为4mg/kg/天,并根据血药浓度进行调整。同时治疗包括皮质类固醇(n = 27)。静脉注射CsA的中位持续时间为10天(4至41天)。在CsA治疗结束时,20例患者病情总体改善,而8例患者因症状加重(n = 7)或穿孔(n = 1)不得不立即进行手术。另1例患者(74岁)因卡氏肺孢子虫感染死亡。对于有反应的患者,维持治疗包括:逐渐减量的类固醇(n = 12)、硫唑嘌呤(n = 12)、5 - 氨基水杨酸或柳氮磺胺吡啶(n = 10)、甲氨蝶呤(n = 1)或口服CsA(n = 11)。中位随访时间为12个月(4至48个月)。在20例有反应的患者中,7例随后因择期手术(n = 3)或疾病复发(n = 4)而接受结肠切除术。在12例接受硫唑嘌呤维持治疗的患者中,只有3例需要进行手术(25%)。在8例未接受硫唑嘌呤治疗的患者中,4例随后接受了结肠切除术(50%)(无统计学差异)。在接受CsA治疗的急性难治性UC患者中,29例患者中有20例(69%)获得了短期疗效(避免立即进行结肠切除术)。然而,中位随访12个月后,只有13例患者未进行结肠切除术(45%)。

相似文献

1
Short- and long-term efficacy of cyclosporin administration in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Belgian IBD Group.环孢素治疗急性重症溃疡性结肠炎患者的短期和长期疗效。比利时炎症性肠病研究组
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1997 Jul-Sep;60(3):197-200.
2
Long-term outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with intravenous cyclosporine A is determined by previous exposure to thiopurines.静脉注射环孢素 A 治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的长期预后取决于先前是否使用过硫唑嘌呤。
J Crohns Colitis. 2010 Oct;4(4):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
3
Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis.影响环孢素 A 治疗难治性溃疡性结肠炎疗效的因素。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Mar;25(3):494-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x.
4
Intravenous cyclosporin in ulcerative colitis: a five-year experience.溃疡性结肠炎的静脉注射环孢素:五年经验
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jun;94(6):1587-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01149.x.
5
Long-term outcome of treatment with intravenous cyclosporin in patients with severe ulcerative colitis.重度溃疡性结肠炎患者静脉注射环孢素治疗的长期疗效
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004 Mar;10(2):73-8. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200403000-00002.
6
[Effectiveness of maintenance azathioprine therapy without oral cyclosporine after severe attacks of ulcerative colitis refractory to endovenous steroids].[溃疡性结肠炎严重发作经静脉类固醇治疗无效后,使用硫唑嘌呤维持治疗且不联用口服环孢素的有效性]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 May;31(5):280-4. doi: 10.1157/13119879.
7
Combination immunomodulatory therapy with cyclosporine and azathioprine in corticosteroid-resistant severe ulcerative colitis: the Edinburgh experience of outcome.环孢素与硫唑嘌呤联合免疫调节疗法治疗对皮质类固醇耐药的重度溃疡性结肠炎:爱丁堡的疗效经验
Dig Liver Dis. 2003 Aug;35(8):546-51. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00270-6.
8
Ciclosporin use in acute ulcerative colitis: a long-term experience.环孢素在急性溃疡性结肠炎中的应用:长期经验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jan;17(1):79-84. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200501000-00016.
9
Intravenous cyclosporin as rescue therapy in severe ulcerative colitis: time for a reappraisal?静脉注射环孢素作为重症溃疡性结肠炎的挽救疗法:是时候重新评估了吗?
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 May;10(5):411-3. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199805000-00010.
10
Efficacy of intravenous cyclosporin in moderately severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroids.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005 Mar;29(3):231-5. doi: 10.1016/s0399-8320(05)80754-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyclosporine Therapy as a Rescue Treatment in Steroid Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Real Life Data From a Tertiary Center.环孢素治疗作为类固醇难治性急性重度溃疡性结肠炎的抢救治疗:来自三级中心的真实数据。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun;33(6):463-469. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21093.
2
Current medical therapy for ulcerative colitis.溃疡性结肠炎的当前医学疗法。
World J Gastroenterol. 1999 Feb;5(1):64-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i1.64.