• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1986年至1994年间的心力衰竭:学术医疗中心药物处方实践、医院再入院率和生存率的时间趋势。

Heart failure between 1986 and 1994: temporal trends in drug-prescribing practices, hospital readmissions, and survival at an academic medical center.

作者信息

McDermott M M, Feinglass J, Lee P, Mehta S, Schmitt B, Lefevre F, Puppala J, Gheorghiade M

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill 60611, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1997 Nov;134(5 Pt 1):901-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)80013-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-8703(97)80013-0
PMID:9398102
Abstract

Since 1987, publications in widely circulated medical journals have reported improved survival and lower hospital readmission rates when patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction are treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. We describe changes in ACE inhibitor use among patients hospitalized with heart failure between 1986 and 1993. Simultaneous trends in readmissions and survival rates are reported. Subjects were 612 consecutive patients hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of heart failure at an academic medical center during the period of Sept. 1, 1986, to Dec. 31, 1987 (interval I) or during the period Aug. 1, 1992, to Nov. 30, 1993 (interval II). Medical records were reviewed for 434 patients, consisting of all patients hospitalized with heart failure during interval II and a randomly selected 50% subset of patients hospitalized during interval I. Among 145 patients with systolic dysfunction whose medical records were reviewed, ACE inhibitor prescriptions significantly increased between interval I and interval II (43% vs 71%, p < 0.01, odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 1.62 to 6.42). Prescriptions of ACE inhibitors combined with digoxin and a diuretic also increased (37% vs 56%, p = 0.02, odds ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 4.32). Among all 612 patients, 6-month heart failure readmission rates increased from 13% to 21% (p = 0.02, odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 2.82). There was no significant change in survival rate between interval I and interval II, however, survival rate was marginally significantly improved among patients with systolic dysfunction. Our results suggest that drug-prescribing practices have significantly changed between 1986 and 1993. The absence of observed improvement in outcomes may result from changes in hospital admission criteria for heart failure.

摘要

自1987年以来,在广泛发行的医学期刊上发表的文章报道称,当心力衰竭和收缩功能障碍患者接受血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂治疗时,生存率得到提高,医院再入院率降低。我们描述了1986年至1993年间因心力衰竭住院患者中ACE抑制剂使用情况的变化。同时报告了再入院率和生存率的趋势。研究对象为1986年9月1日至1987年12月31日(时间段I)或1992年8月1日至1993年11月30日(时间段II)期间在一所学术医疗中心连续住院的612例主要诊断为心力衰竭的患者。对434例患者的病历进行了审查,其中包括时间段II期间所有因心力衰竭住院的患者以及从时间段I期间住院患者中随机抽取的50%的子集。在145例接受病历审查的收缩功能障碍患者中,ACE抑制剂处方在时间段I和时间段II之间显著增加(43%对71%,p<0.01,优势比3.22,95%置信区间1.62至6.42)。ACE抑制剂与地高辛和利尿剂联合使用的处方也增加了(37%对56%,p = 0.02,优势比2.22,95%置信区间1.14至4.32)。在所有612例患者中,6个月的心力衰竭再入院率从13%增加到21%(p = 0.02,优势比1.79,95%置信区间1.10至2.82)。时间段I和时间段II之间的生存率没有显著变化,然而,收缩功能障碍患者的生存率有轻微的显著改善。我们的结果表明,1986年至1993年间药物处方实践发生了显著变化。未观察到结局改善可能是由于心力衰竭住院标准的变化。

相似文献

1
Heart failure between 1986 and 1994: temporal trends in drug-prescribing practices, hospital readmissions, and survival at an academic medical center.1986年至1994年间的心力衰竭:学术医疗中心药物处方实践、医院再入院率和生存率的时间趋势。
Am Heart J. 1997 Nov;134(5 Pt 1):901-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)80013-0.
2
Temporal trends in pharmacotherapy for congestive heart failure at an academic medical center: 1990-1995.某学术医疗中心1990 - 1995年充血性心力衰竭药物治疗的时间趋势
Am Heart J. 1998 Mar;135(3):367-72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70309-6.
3
Patterns of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescriptions, educational interventions, and outcomes among hospitalized patients with heart failure.住院心力衰竭患者中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂处方模式、教育干预措施及治疗结果
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Apr;21(4):261-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210406.
4
Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function.
Am Heart J. 1997 Aug;134(2 Pt 1):188-95. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70123-6.
5
Prescribing patterns of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy and outcomes in the ASIAN-HF registry: a cohort study.基于证据的心力衰竭药物治疗的处方模式和 ASIAN-HF 注册研究的结果:一项队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1008-e1018. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30306-1.
6
Prescribing and emergency admissions for heart failure in greater Glasgow.格拉斯哥大区心力衰竭的处方开具与急诊入院情况
J Card Fail. 1999 Mar;5(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/s1071-9164(99)90018-0.
7
Early use of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the United States: experience from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 participants.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Nov 15;84(10):1176-81. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00530-5.
8
Discharge use of angiotensin receptor blockers provides comparable effects with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的出院使用在因心力衰竭住院的患者结局方面提供了与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相当的效果。
Hypertens Res. 2010 Mar;33(3):197-202. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.199. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
9
Pharmacotherapy Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Health Resource Utilization Among Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction at a U.S. Academic Medical Center.美国一家学术医疗中心射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的药物治疗模式、治疗结果及卫生资源利用情况
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Feb;36(2):174-86. doi: 10.1002/phar.1701. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Patterns of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use in congestive heart failure in two community hospitals.两家社区医院充血性心力衰竭患者中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用模式
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Apr 15;77(10):832-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89177-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The heart failure epidemic.心力衰竭流行。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Apr;7(4):1807-30. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7041807. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
2
Trends in length of stay and short-term outcomes among Medicare patients hospitalized for heart failure, 1993-2006.1993-2006 年 Medicare 心力衰竭住院患者住院时间和短期结局的趋势。
JAMA. 2010 Jun 2;303(21):2141-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.748.
3
The impact of pre-existing heart failure on pneumonia prognosis: population-based cohort study.既往存在的心力衰竭对肺炎预后的影响:基于人群的队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1407-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0672-3. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
4
Therapies for acute heart failure in patients with reduced kidney function: a community-based perspective.肾功能减退患者急性心力衰竭的治疗:基于社区的视角
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Apr;51(4):594-602. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.021. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
5
Use of nesiritide before and after publications suggesting drug-related risks in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.在有关急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者药物相关风险的文献发表前后奈西立肽的使用情况。
JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1877-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.15.1877.
6
Underutilisation of ACE inhibitors in patients with congestive heart failure.充血性心力衰竭患者中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用不足。
Drugs. 2001;61(14):2021-33. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161140-00002.
7
Quality of congestive heart failure treatment at a Canadian teaching hospital.加拿大一家教学医院的充血性心力衰竭治疗质量。
CMAJ. 2001 Aug 7;165(3):284-7.
8
Management of heart failure: evidence versus practice. Does current prescribing provide optimal treatment for heart failure patients?心力衰竭的管理:证据与实践。目前的处方是否为心力衰竭患者提供了最佳治疗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Sep;50(458):735-42.
9
Diuretic therapy in elderly heart failure patients with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction.老年心力衰竭患者伴或不伴左心室收缩功能障碍时的利尿治疗
Drugs Aging. 2000 Apr;16(4):289-300. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200016040-00005.
10
The economic burden of heart failure.心力衰竭的经济负担。
Clin Cardiol. 2000 Mar;23(3 Suppl):III6-10. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960231503.