Nikula K J, Avila K J, Griffith W C, Mauderly J L
Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Sep;105 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1231-4. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s51231.
The usefulness of pulmonary carcinogenicity data from rats exposed to high concentrations of particles for quantitatively predicting lung cancer risk in humans exposed to much lower environmental or occupational concentrations has been questioned. The results of several chronic inhalation bioassays of poorly soluble, nonfibrous particles have suggested that rats may be more prone than other rodent species to develop persistent pulmonary epithelial hyperplasia, metaplasia, and tumors in response to the accumulation of inhaled particles. In addition, rats and primates differ in their pulmonary anatomy and rate of particle clearance from the lung. This paper reviews results of recent Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute (Albuquerque, NM) investigations that directly compared the anatomical patterns of particle retention and the lung tissue responses of rats and monkeys exposed chronically to high occupational concentrations of poorly soluble particles. Lung sections from male cynomolgus monkeys and F344 rats exposed 7 hr/day, 5 days/week for 24 months to filtered ambient air, diesel exhaust (2 mg soot/m3), coal dust (2 mg respirable particulate material/m3), or diesel exhaust and coal dust combined (1 mg soot and 1 mg respirable coal dust/m3) were obtained from a study conducted at the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and examined histopathologically and morphometrically. Within each species, the sites of particle retention and lung tissue responses were the same for diesel soot, coal dust, and combined material. Rats retained a significantly greater portion of the particulate material in the lumens of alveolar ducts and alveoli than monkeys. Conversely, monkeys retained a significantly greater portion of the particulate material in the interstitium than rats. Rats, but not monkeys, had significant alveolar epithelial hyperplastic, inflammatory, and septal fibrotic responses to the retained particles. These results suggest that anatomic patterns of particle retention and lung tissue reactions in rats may not be predictive of retention patterns and tissue responses in primates that inhale poorly soluble particles at concentrations representing high occupational exposures.
长期暴露于高浓度颗粒的大鼠的肺致癌性数据,对于定量预测暴露于低得多的环境或职业浓度的人类患肺癌风险的实用性受到了质疑。几种难溶性、非纤维性颗粒的慢性吸入生物测定结果表明,与其他啮齿动物相比,大鼠可能更容易因吸入颗粒的积累而出现持续性肺上皮增生、化生和肿瘤。此外,大鼠和灵长类动物在肺解剖结构和颗粒从肺中清除的速率方面存在差异。本文综述了洛夫莱斯呼吸研究所(新墨西哥州阿尔伯克基)最近的研究结果,这些研究直接比较了长期暴露于高职业浓度难溶性颗粒的大鼠和猴子的颗粒滞留解剖模式以及肺组织反应。从美国国家职业安全与健康研究所进行的一项研究中获取了雄性食蟹猴和F344大鼠的肺切片,这些动物每天暴露7小时、每周暴露5天,持续24个月,分别暴露于过滤后的环境空气、柴油废气(2毫克碳黑/立方米)、煤尘(2毫克可吸入颗粒物/立方米)或柴油废气与煤尘的混合物(1毫克碳黑和1毫克可吸入煤尘/立方米),并进行了组织病理学和形态计量学检查。在每个物种中,柴油碳黑、煤尘和混合物质的颗粒滞留部位和肺组织反应是相同的。大鼠在肺泡管和肺泡腔中保留的颗粒物质比例明显高于猴子。相反,猴子在间质中保留的颗粒物质比例明显高于大鼠。大鼠对滞留颗粒有明显的肺泡上皮增生、炎症和间隔纤维化反应,而猴子则没有。这些结果表明,大鼠的颗粒滞留解剖模式和肺组织反应可能无法预测吸入高职业暴露浓度难溶性颗粒的灵长类动物的滞留模式和组织反应。