Suppr超能文献

胰岛素依赖型糖尿病强化治疗的不良反应风险:一项荟萃分析。

Risk of adverse effects of intensified treatment in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Stettler C, Diem P

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 1997 Nov;14(11):919-28. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199711)14:11<919::AID-DIA456>3.0.CO;2-A.

Abstract

While the benefits of intensified insulin treatment in insulin-dependent (Type 1) diabetes mellitus (IDDM) are well recognized, the risks have not been comprehensively characterized. We examined the risk of severe hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis, and death in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The MEDLINE database, reference lists, and specialist journals were searched electronically or by hand to identify relevant studies with at least 6 months of follow-up and the monitoring of glycaemia by glycosylated haemoglobin measurements. Logistic regression was used for calculation of combined odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The influence of covariates was examined by including covariate-by-treatment interaction terms. Methodological study quality was assessed and sensitivity analyses were performed. Fourteen trials were identified. These contributed 16 comparisons with 1028 patients allocated to intensified and 1039 allocated to conventional treatment. A total of 846 patients suffered at least one episode of severe hypoglycaemia, 175 patients experienced ketoacidosis and 26 patients died. The combined odds ratio (95% CI) for hypoglycaemia was 2.99 (2.45-3.64), for ketoacidosis 1.74 (1.27-2.38) and for death from all causes 1.40 (0.65-3.01). The risk of severe hypoglycaemia was determined by the degree of normalization of glycaemia achieved (p=0.005 for interaction term), with the results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in line with the other trials. Ketoacidosis risk depended on the type of intensified treatment used. Odds ratios (95% CI) were 7.20 (2.95-17.58) for exclusive use of pumps, 1.13 (0.15-8.35) for multiple daily injections and 1.28 (0.90-1.83) for trials offering a choice between the two (p = 0.004 for interaction). Mortality was significantly (p = 0.007) increased for causes potentially associated with acute complications (7 vs 0 deaths, 5 deaths attributed to ketoacidosis, and 2 sudden deaths), and non-significantly (p = 0.16) decreased for macrovascular causes (3 vs 8 deaths). We conclude that there is a substantial risk of severe adverse effects associated with intensified insulin treatment. Mortality from acute metabolic causes is increased; however, this is largely counterbalanced by a reduction in cardiovascular mortality. The excess of severe hypoglycemia in the DCCT is not exceptional. Multiple daily injection schemes may be safer than treatment with insulin pumps.

摘要

虽然强化胰岛素治疗在胰岛素依赖型(1型)糖尿病(IDDM)中的益处已得到充分认可,但其风险尚未得到全面描述。我们通过对随机对照试验的荟萃分析,研究了严重低血糖、酮症酸中毒和死亡的风险。通过电子检索或手工检索MEDLINE数据库、参考文献列表和专业期刊,以识别至少有6个月随访且通过糖化血红蛋白测量监测血糖的相关研究。采用逻辑回归计算合并比值比和95%置信区间(95%CI)。通过纳入协变量与治疗的交互项来检验协变量的影响。评估方法学研究质量并进行敏感性分析。共识别出14项试验。这些试验提供了16组比较,其中1028例患者被分配接受强化治疗,1039例患者被分配接受常规治疗。共有846例患者至少发生一次严重低血糖事件,175例患者发生酮症酸中毒,26例患者死亡。低血糖的合并比值比(95%CI)为2.99(2.45 - 3.64),酮症酸中毒为1.74(1.27 - 2.38),全因死亡为1.40(0.65 - 3.01)。严重低血糖的风险取决于血糖达到正常化的程度(交互项p = 0.005),糖尿病控制与并发症试验(DCCT)的结果与其他试验一致。酮症酸中毒风险取决于所使用的强化治疗类型。单纯使用胰岛素泵的比值比(95%CI)为7.20(2.95 - 17.58),每日多次注射为1.13(0.15 - 8.35),提供两种治疗选择的试验为1.28(0.90 - 1.83)(交互项p = 0.004)。与急性并发症潜在相关的死因导致的死亡率显著升高(p = 0.007)(7例死亡 vs 0例死亡,5例死亡归因于酮症酸中毒,2例猝死),而大血管病因导致的死亡率无显著降低(3例死亡 vs 8例死亡,p = 0.16)。我们得出结论,强化胰岛素治疗存在严重不良反应的重大风险。急性代谢性病因导致的死亡率增加;然而,这在很大程度上被心血管死亡率的降低所抵消。DCCT中严重低血糖的过量情况并非例外。每日多次注射方案可能比胰岛素泵治疗更安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验