Gregory Justin M, Kraft Guillaume, Scott Melanie F, Neal Doss W, Farmer Ben, Smith Marta S, Hastings Jon R, Allen Eric J, Donahue E Patrick, Rivera Noelia, Winnick Jason J, Edgerton Dale S, Nishimura Erica, Fledelius Christian, Brand Christian L, Cherrington Alan D
Ian M. Burr Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Diabetes. 2015 Oct;64(10):3439-51. doi: 10.2337/db15-0071. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
Hypoglycemia limits optimal glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), making novel strategies to mitigate it desirable. We hypothesized that portal (Po) vein insulin delivery would lessen hypoglycemia. In the conscious dog, insulin was infused into the hepatic Po vein or a peripheral (Pe) vein at a rate four times of basal. In protocol 1, a full counterregulatory response was allowed, whereas in protocol 2, glucagon was fixed at basal, mimicking the diminished α-cell response to hypoglycemia seen in T1DM. In protocol 1, glucose fell faster with Pe insulin than with Po insulin, reaching 56 ± 3 vs. 70 ± 6 mg/dL (P = 0.04) at 60 min. The change in area under the curve (ΔAUC) for glucagon was similar between Pe and Po, but the peak occurred earlier in Pe. The ΔAUC for epinephrine was greater with Pe than with Po (67 ± 17 vs. 36 ± 14 ng/mL/180 min). In protocol 2, glucose also fell more rapidly than in protocol 1 and fell faster in Pe than in Po, reaching 41 ± 3 vs. 67 ± 2 mg/dL (P < 0.01) by 60 min. Without a rise in glucagon, the epinephrine responses were much larger (ΔAUC of 204 ± 22 for Pe vs. 96 ± 29 ng/mL/180 min for Po). In summary, Pe insulin delivery exacerbates hypoglycemia, particularly in the presence of a diminished glucagon response. Po vein insulin delivery, or strategies that mimic it (i.e., liver-preferential insulin analogs), should therefore lessen hypoglycemia.
低血糖限制了1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者实现最佳血糖控制,因此需要新的策略来缓解低血糖。我们假设门静脉(Po)输注胰岛素可减轻低血糖。在清醒犬中,以基础速率的四倍将胰岛素注入肝门静脉或外周(Pe)静脉。在方案1中,允许出现完整的反调节反应,而在方案2中,胰高血糖素固定在基础水平,模拟T1DM中α细胞对低血糖反应减弱的情况。在方案1中,外周静脉注射胰岛素时血糖下降速度比门静脉注射更快,60分钟时血糖分别降至56±3与70±6mg/dL(P = 0.04)。外周静脉和门静脉注射时胰高血糖素曲线下面积的变化(ΔAUC)相似,但外周静脉注射时胰高血糖素峰值出现更早。外周静脉注射时肾上腺素的ΔAUC大于门静脉注射(67±17与36±14ng/mL/180分钟)。在方案2中,血糖下降也比方案1更快,外周静脉注射时血糖下降比门静脉注射更快,60分钟时分别降至41±3与67±2mg/dL(P < 0.01)。在胰高血糖素未升高的情况下,肾上腺素反应更大(外周静脉注射的ΔAUC为204±22,门静脉注射为96±29ng/mL/180分钟)。总之,外周静脉注射胰岛素会加重低血糖,尤其是在胰高血糖素反应减弱的情况下。因此,门静脉注射胰岛素或模拟门静脉注射的策略(即肝脏优先胰岛素类似物)应可减轻低血糖。