Plesner T, Behrendt N, Ploug M
Department of Hematology, Herlev Hospital, University Hospital, Denmark.
Stem Cells. 1997;15(6):398-408. doi: 10.1002/stem.150398.
Several important functions have been assigned to the receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator, uPAR. As implied by the name, uPAR was first identified as a high affinity cellular receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA). It mediates the binding of the zymogen, pro-uPA, to the plasma membrane where trace amounts of plasmin will initiate a series of events referred to as "reciprocal zymogen activation" where plasmin converts pro-uPA to the active enzyme, uPA, which in turn converts plasma membrane-associated plasminogen to plasmin. This is an efficient machinery to generate broad-spectrum proteolytic activity which is spatially restricted to the plasma membrane, since plasmin that diffuses away from the plasma membrane is rapidly inactivated by circulating inhibitors (i.e., alpha 2-antiplasmin). The system is controlled by a series of plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAIs), most importantly PAI-1 and PAI-2, providing means of temporally restricting the process of plasminogen activation. In addition to its role in plasminogen activation, compelling evidence has demonstrated a role for uPAR in cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix adhesion, both directly and indirectly. uPAR is directly involved in binding to the extracellular matrix molecule, vitronectin, and the affinity of this binding is increased when uPAR is occupied by (pro-)uPA. A more indirect but presumably very important role of uPAR in cell adhesion seems to be mediated through interactions between uPAR and beta 1- or beta 2-integrins. It has been demonstrated that uPAR may bind physically to integrins in a reversible manner. The interaction seems to be of functional importance since the affinity of the integrin for its corresponding ligand is modulated by the association of integrin with uPAR. In some experimental setups uPAR has been shown to reduce the affinity of the associated integrin for certain ligands, while other experimental systems have demonstrated an increased affinity of the interaction between integrin and ligand after binding of uPAR to the integrin. Finally, uPAR has also been shown to participate in signal transduction events. Since uPAR is not a transmembrane molecule but belongs to the group of proteins that are tethered to the plasma membrane via a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor, association with a transmembrane adaptor is required for transmission of signals via uPAR. Integrins may serve as such signal transducers, and indeed uPAR has been shown to be associated in the plasma membrane with complexes of integrins and (phosphorylated) tyrosin kinases suggesting a role for these complexes in transmembrane transmission of signals via uPAR. In the hematopoietic system it has been shown that urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) is expressed as a differentiation antigen on cells of the myelomonocytic lineage and as an activation antigen on monocytes and T lymphocytes. Neutrophils contain intracellular reservoirs of uPAR that are translocated to the plasma membrane upon activation, and neutrophils from patients with the rare blood disease paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) that fail to express glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins including uPAR, show a very significantly reduced transmigration over an endothelial barrier. Cell-associated plasminogen activation by PNH-affected neutrophils is severely impaired, and it has been proposed that this may be causally related to the propensity for thrombosis in PNH. The pattern of expression of uPAR in hematological malignancies mirrors the expression by normal blood and bone marrow counterparts with some exceptions (differentiated myeloid leukemias are positive, undifferentiated myeloid may be negative and the majority of lymphoid leukemias and lymphomas are negative). The potential clinical relevance of uPAR expression in leukemias and lymphomas has not been determined.
尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(uPAR)具有多种重要功能。顾名思义,uPAR最初被鉴定为尿激酶纤溶酶原激活物(uPA)的高亲和力细胞受体。它介导酶原(pro - uPA)与质膜的结合,在质膜上,微量的纤溶酶会引发一系列被称为“相互酶原激活”的事件,即纤溶酶将pro - uPA转化为活性酶uPA,而uPA又将与质膜相关的纤溶酶原转化为纤溶酶。这是一种产生广谱蛋白水解活性的有效机制,且这种活性在空间上局限于质膜,因为从质膜扩散出去的纤溶酶会迅速被循环中的抑制剂(即α2 - 抗纤溶酶)灭活。该系统由一系列纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂(PAIs)控制,其中最重要的是PAI - 1和PAI - 2,它们提供了在时间上限制纤溶酶原激活过程的手段。除了在纤溶酶原激活中的作用外,有力的证据表明uPAR在细胞 - 细胞和细胞 - 细胞外基质黏附中直接或间接地发挥作用。uPAR直接参与与细胞外基质分子玻连蛋白的结合,当uPAR被(pro -)uPA占据时,这种结合的亲和力会增加。uPAR在细胞黏附中一个更间接但可能非常重要的作用似乎是通过uPAR与β1或β2整合素之间的相互作用介导的。已经证明uPAR可能以可逆的方式与整合素物理结合。这种相互作用似乎具有功能重要性,因为整合素与其相应配体的亲和力会受到整合素与uPAR结合的调节。在一些实验设置中,uPAR已被证明会降低相关整合素对某些配体的亲和力,而在其他实验系统中,uPAR与整合素结合后,整合素与配体之间相互作用的亲和力则会增加。最后,uPAR也被证明参与信号转导事件。由于uPAR不是跨膜分子,而是属于通过糖基磷脂酰肌醇锚定在质膜上的蛋白质组,因此需要与跨膜衔接子结合才能通过uPAR传递信号。整合素可能充当这样一种信号转导分子,实际上,uPAR已被证明在质膜上与整合素和(磷酸化)酪氨酸激酶的复合物相关联,这表明这些复合物在通过uPAR进行跨膜信号传递中发挥作用。在造血系统中,已表明尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物(uPAR)在髓单核细胞系细胞上作为分化抗原表达,在单核细胞和T淋巴细胞上作为激活抗原表达。中性粒细胞含有uPAR的细胞内储存库,在激活时会转运到质膜,而患有罕见血液疾病阵发性夜间血红蛋白尿(PNH)的患者的中性粒细胞,由于无法表达包括uPAR在内的糖基磷脂酰肌醇锚定蛋白,在内皮屏障上的迁移能力显著降低。受PNH影响的中性粒细胞的细胞相关纤溶酶原激活严重受损,有人提出这可能与PNH中血栓形成的倾向存在因果关系。uPAR在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的表达模式与正常血液和骨髓对应物的表达相似,但也有一些例外(分化型髓系白血病呈阳性,未分化型髓系可能为阴性,大多数淋巴细胞白血病和淋巴瘤为阴性)。uPAR在白血病和淋巴瘤中表达的潜在临床相关性尚未确定。