Hooke F G, Clement P, Dell'Osa D, Porter R M, MacColl D, Rew R S
Pfizer, Sydney, Australia.
Vet Parasitol. 1997 Sep;72(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00077-0.
Two similar studies were conducted in New Zealand to compare the therapeutic and persistent activity of doramectin injectable, moxidectin pour-on, ivermectin pour-on and oxfendazole oral drench when administered to nematode-infected cattle which were then grazed on common pastures. On day 0 (treatment day), 40 cattle were weighed, faecal sampled and allocated on the basis of day--3 faecal egg counts (FEC) to four treatment groups. Cattle were then treated with either doramectin by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection, moxidectin and ivermectin by topical application, or oxfendazole orally using label-recommended dosages. Oxfendazole treatment served primarily as a control to monitor reinfection without persistent activity. Faecal samples for nematode egg counts and coprocultures for larval differentiation were collected six times between day 0 and day 56 and all cattle were reweighed on day 56. Doramectin reduced pretreatment FEC by 99.1% in the first study and by 100% in the second study when assessed at 14 days posttreatment. Corresponding reductions for moxidectin were 80.8% and 85.2%, for ivermectin 86.0% and 80% and oxfendazole 78.3% and 100%, respectively. Posttreatment rise in FEC indicated that reinfection of moxidectin-treated animals occurred at the same time as oxfendazole controls in both trials. Posttreatment rise in FEC with ivermectin pour-on was similar to moxidectin and oxfendazole in one study, but in the other study ivermectin pour-on delayed the rise by 14-21 days. The rise in FEC for doramectin was delayed for 14-21 days in one study and at least 21 days in the other. The better parasite control provided by doramectin resulted in greater weight gains for cattle over the 56-day period as compared to moxidectin pour-on, ivermectin pour-on and oxfendazole in both trials. Gains of doramectin treated cattle were significantly (p < 0.05) greater than those of ivermectin and moxidectin groups in one trial and the oxfendazole group only in the other.
在新西兰进行了两项类似研究,以比较多拉菌素注射液、莫昔克丁浇泼剂、伊维菌素浇泼剂和奥芬达唑口服灌服剂在用于感染线虫的牛后(这些牛随后在公共牧场放牧)的治疗活性和持续活性。在第0天(治疗日),对40头牛称重、采集粪便样本,并根据第 - 3天的粪便虫卵计数(FEC)将其分配到四个治疗组。然后,牛分别接受皮下(s.c.)注射多拉菌素、局部应用莫昔克丁和伊维菌素,或口服奥芬达唑,均使用标签推荐剂量。奥芬达唑治疗主要作为对照,以监测无持续活性情况下的再感染情况。在第0天至第56天期间,六次采集粪便样本用于线虫虫卵计数,并进行粪便培养以区分幼虫,所有牛在第56天再次称重。在第一项研究中,治疗后14天评估时,多拉菌素使治疗前FEC降低了99.1%,在第二项研究中降低了100%。莫昔克丁相应的降低率分别为80.8%和85.2%,伊维菌素为86.0%和80%,奥芬达唑为78.3%和100%。治疗后FEC升高表明,在两项试验中,莫昔克丁治疗的动物与奥芬达唑对照组同时发生再感染。在一项研究中,伊维菌素浇泼剂治疗后FEC升高情况与莫昔克丁和奥芬达唑相似,但在另一项研究中,伊维菌素浇泼剂使升高延迟了14 - 21天。在一项研究中,多拉菌素FEC升高延迟了14 - 21天,在另一项研究中至少延迟了21天。与莫昔克丁浇泼剂、伊维菌素浇泼剂和奥芬达唑相比,在两项试验中,多拉菌素提供的更好的寄生虫控制导致牛在为期56天的时间里体重增加更多。在一项试验中,多拉菌素治疗的牛的体重增加显著(p < 0.05)高于伊维菌素和莫昔克丁组,在另一项试验中仅高于奥芬达唑组。