Cull A M
ICRF Medical Oncology Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, U.K.
Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jul;33 Suppl 6:S3-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00194-9.
Quality of life (QL) assessment is now regarded as desirable, if not mandatory, by agencies supporting cancer clinical trials around the world, yet doubts persist about the relevance of QL data to clinical practice. A plethora of QL measures is available but the quality of published work remains suboptimal. The appropriate choice of instrument is essential if outcome measures are to be valid and clinically meaningful. This paper reviews the considerations which should determine the choice of QL questionnaire and, taking the specific example of the EORTC approach, aims to provide users with an update on the current state of the art in the development of cancer-specific QL questionnaires.
生活质量(QL)评估如今被全球支持癌症临床试验的机构视为即便不是强制要求也是理想之举,但对于QL数据与临床实践的相关性仍存在疑虑。有大量的QL测量方法可供使用,但已发表研究的质量仍不尽人意。如果要使结果测量有效且具有临床意义,那么仪器的恰当选择至关重要。本文回顾了决定QL问卷选择的相关考量因素,并以欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的方法为例,旨在为使用者提供有关癌症特异性QL问卷发展现状的最新信息。