Suppr超能文献

Norplant皮下埋植剂与奥豪斯T380宫内节育器的临床性能、避孕效果、可逆性及可接受性比较。

A comparison of the clinical performance, contraceptive efficacy, reversibility and acceptability of Norplant implants and Ortho Gynae T380 intrauterine copper contraceptive device.

作者信息

Singh K, Ratnam S S

出版信息

Adv Contracept. 1997 Dec;13(4):385-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1006580325110.

Abstract

In this comparative study, the five-year continuity rate of 53.7% in the Norplant implants group was comparable to that of 52.7% in the copper IUD group. The difference was not statistically significant. Only one accidental pregnancy occurred during the five years of copper IUD use. Desire for future pregnancy was the main reason for removal in the Norplant implants group (35.9%) while expulsion of the IUD (13.2%) was the main reason for removal of the copper IUD. Menstrual disturbance was not a major side-effect in either group. The post-removal conception rates of 78.6% in the Norplant implants group and 75.0% in the copper IUD were good and comparable. Both the Norplant implants and copper IUD are acceptable and effective contraceptive methods in Singapore.

摘要

在这项对比研究中,诺普兰植入剂组53.7%的五年续用率与铜宫内节育器组52.7%的续用率相当。差异无统计学意义。在使用铜宫内节育器的五年中仅发生了一例意外妊娠。希望未来怀孕是诺普兰植入剂组取出的主要原因(35.9%),而宫内节育器的排出(13.2%)是铜宫内节育器取出的主要原因。月经紊乱在两组中均不是主要副作用。诺普兰植入剂组78.6%的取出后受孕率和铜宫内节育器组75.0%的取出后受孕率良好且相当。在新加坡,诺普兰植入剂和铜宫内节育器都是可接受且有效的避孕方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验