Core outcomes measures for inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND

Demands on the medical profession to develop performance measures and demonstrate cost-effectiveness make it imperative that a uniform approach to the measurement of outcomes for common conditions be adopted. We report here on patient acceptance, response rates, and utility of a new set of core outcomes measures for patients with inguinal hernia (IH), which incorporates patient reporting of outcomes.

METHODS

Beginning in March 1994, a convenience sample of patients scheduled for IH repair completed a series of questionnaires addressing a range of patient case mix and outcomes dimensions, including demographics, comorbid conditions, SF-36 health status (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey), and condition-specific questions, expectations, and responses to the surgical experience before and after operation. Surgical data were abstracted from the medical records.

RESULTS

One hundred three patients were entered in the study; 63 completed 2-month reports and 44 completed 6-month reports. Acceptance of the study and response rates were excellent. Differences in health status associated with IH have been identified in two SF-36 domains, and changes in function after repair noted in several others, supporting the applicability of this measure. Outcomes may also differ by type of hernia and type of repair performed.

CONCLUSIONS

A core outcomes measurement set for IH that encompasses demographics, comorbidities, health status, expectations, utilization, and condition-specific data provides a portrait of patient outcomes that is useful to providers and patients, and combined with cost and satisfaction data, it can be used for benchmarking and improving surgical care.