• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹股沟疝修补术的核心结局指标

Core outcomes measures for inguinal hernia repair.

作者信息

Burney R E, Jones K R, Coon J W, Blewitt D K, Herm A, Peterson M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0331, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Dec;185(6):509-15. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00108-7.

DOI:10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00108-7
PMID:9404871
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Demands on the medical profession to develop performance measures and demonstrate cost-effectiveness make it imperative that a uniform approach to the measurement of outcomes for common conditions be adopted. We report here on patient acceptance, response rates, and utility of a new set of core outcomes measures for patients with inguinal hernia (IH), which incorporates patient reporting of outcomes.

METHODS

Beginning in March 1994, a convenience sample of patients scheduled for IH repair completed a series of questionnaires addressing a range of patient case mix and outcomes dimensions, including demographics, comorbid conditions, SF-36 health status (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey), and condition-specific questions, expectations, and responses to the surgical experience before and after operation. Surgical data were abstracted from the medical records.

RESULTS

One hundred three patients were entered in the study; 63 completed 2-month reports and 44 completed 6-month reports. Acceptance of the study and response rates were excellent. Differences in health status associated with IH have been identified in two SF-36 domains, and changes in function after repair noted in several others, supporting the applicability of this measure. Outcomes may also differ by type of hernia and type of repair performed.

CONCLUSIONS

A core outcomes measurement set for IH that encompasses demographics, comorbidities, health status, expectations, utilization, and condition-specific data provides a portrait of patient outcomes that is useful to providers and patients, and combined with cost and satisfaction data, it can be used for benchmarking and improving surgical care.

摘要

背景

医学界面临着制定绩效指标并证明成本效益的要求,因此必须采用统一的方法来衡量常见病症的治疗结果。我们在此报告一套针对腹股沟疝(IH)患者的新的核心结局指标的患者接受度、回复率及效用,该指标纳入了患者对结局的报告。

方法

从1994年3月开始,对计划进行腹股沟疝修补术的患者进行便利抽样,让他们完成一系列问卷,涉及一系列患者病例组合和结局维度,包括人口统计学、合并症、SF-36健康状况(医学结局研究36项简短健康调查)以及特定病情的问题、期望和对手术前后经历的反应。手术数据从病历中提取。

结果

103名患者进入研究;63人完成了2个月的报告,44人完成了6个月的报告。研究的接受度和回复率都很高。在SF-36的两个领域中发现了与腹股沟疝相关的健康状况差异,在其他几个领域也注意到了修补术后功能的变化,这支持了该指标的适用性。结局也可能因疝的类型和所进行的修补类型而异。

结论

一套针对腹股沟疝的核心结局指标,涵盖人口统计学、合并症、健康状况、期望、利用率和特定病情数据,为医疗服务提供者和患者提供了有用的患者结局描述,再结合成本和满意度数据,可用于基准测试和改善手术护理。

相似文献

1
Core outcomes measures for inguinal hernia repair.腹股沟疝修补术的核心结局指标
J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Dec;185(6):509-15. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00108-7.
2
First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure--quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients.采用超普网片行李chtenstein疝修补术作为节省成本手术的初步结果——对一系列门诊手术患者结合改良生活质量问卷(SF-36)进行质量控制
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Jun 30;9(6):323-7.
3
Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后的长期生活质量及预后
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):261-269. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
4
[Patient expectations before elective surgery of inguinal hernia. What are the sequelae for ambulatory surgery of inguinal hernia with reference to DRG?].
Chirurg. 2004 May;75(5):515-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0769-5.
5
Local versus general anaesthesia with Prolene Hernia System mesh for inguinal hernia repair: early and long-term outcomes.使用普理灵疝修补装置网片进行腹股沟疝修补时局部麻醉与全身麻醉的比较:早期和长期结果
Dig Surg. 2008;25(5):347-50. doi: 10.1159/000159623. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
6
Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians: a follow-up study.腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术在 80 岁以上患者中的比较:随访研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013 Apr;13(2):329-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00902.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
7
Inguinal hernia surgery in The Netherlands: a baseline study before the introduction of the Dutch Guidelines.荷兰的腹股沟疝手术:荷兰指南出台前的一项基线研究。
Hernia. 2005 May;9(2):172-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-005-0317-y. Epub 2005 Feb 19.
8
Direct application of single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair by an experienced single-port laparoscopic surgeon who was inexperienced in conventional TEP hernia repair: initial experience with 100 cases.由一位在传统经腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术方面经验不足,但在单孔腹腔镜手术方面经验丰富的外科医生直接进行单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术:100例初步经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 May;24(5):333-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0497. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
9
[The quality of patient care under the German DRG system using as example the inguinal hernia repair].[以腹股沟疝修补术为例探讨德国疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)系统下的患者护理质量]
Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Feb;133(1):51-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1004666.
10
Inguinal hernia repair: are ASA grades 3 and 4 patients suitable for day case hernia repair?腹股沟疝修补术:美国麻醉医师协会3级和4级患者适合日间手术疝修补吗?
Hernia. 2006 Aug;10(4):299-302. doi: 10.1007/s10029-005-0048-0. Epub 2006 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of abdominal compliance on surgical stress and postoperative recovery in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study.腹部顺应性对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中手术应激及术后恢复的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Hernia. 2024 Dec 3;29(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03232-4.
2
Validation of the carolinas comfort scale (CCS) in Brazil: a hernia-specific quality of life questionnaire.卡罗莱纳舒适度量表(CCS)在巴西的验证:一种疝特异性生活质量问卷。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1783-1788. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03083-z. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
3
Postoperative outcomes that matter to patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: A qualitative study.
对接受腹股沟疝修补术患者重要的术后结果:一项定性研究。
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Jul 22;10:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.07.002. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial.用于原发性腹股沟疝修补的UltraPro疝修补系统、普理灵疝修补系统和李金斯坦手术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的3年结果
Hernia. 2016 Oct;20(5):641-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1507-5. Epub 2016 May 18.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Dutch Version of the Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS-NL).荷兰版髋关节与腹股沟功能评分(HAGOS-NL)的跨文化调适与验证
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0148119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148119. eCollection 2016.
6
Expectations in the context of gallbladder and hernia surgery: a descriptive report.胆囊和疝气手术背景下的期望:一份描述性报告。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1797-806. doi: 10.1111/hex.12171. Epub 2014 Jan 5.
7
Health-related quality of life scores changes significantly within the first three months after hernia mesh repair.疝气补片修复术后的头三个月内,与健康相关的生活质量评分会发生显著变化。
World J Surg. 2014 Jul;38(7):1852-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2411-0.
8
Comparison of the Dutch and English versions of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a specific quality-of-life questionnaire for abdominal hernia repairs with mesh.卡罗来纳舒适度量表荷兰语版和英语版的比较:一种用于网片修补腹部疝的特定生活质量问卷。
Hernia. 2014 Aug;18(4):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1173-9. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
9
Hernia repair: Outcomes other than recurrence should be analysed.疝修补术:应分析除复发之外的其他结果。
BMJ. 2008 May 10;336(7652):1033. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39568.437975.80.
10
Patient-reported outcomes in hernia repair.疝修补术中患者报告的结局
Hernia. 2008 Aug;12(4):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0364-2. Epub 2008 Apr 1.