Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌中雌激素和孕激素受体标准化免疫组织化学与生化检测方法的比较。

Comparison of standardized immunohistochemical and biochemical assays for estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast carcinoma.

作者信息

Golouh R, Vrhovec I, Bracko M, Frković-Grazio S

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Pathol Res Pract. 1997;193(8):543-9. doi: 10.1016/s0344-0338(97)80012-x.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression assessed by dextran-coated charcoal method (DCC) and standardized immunohistochemical method (IHC) in a prospective series of 557 primary breast carcinomas, to assess the concordance between the two assays, and to evaluate the association between hormone receptor expression and various clinicopathological parameters. For ER, results of both methods were in agreement in 73.6% of the cases (277 positive, 133 negative), 74 tumors (13.3%) where IHC+/DCC- and 73 (13.1%) were IHC-/DCC+. For PR, concordant results were observed in 72.7% of the cases (201 positive and 204 negative), 127 tumors (22.8%) were IHC+/DCC- and 25 (4.5%) were IHC-/DCC+. Irrespective of the method used, ER and PR positivity showed a strong negative association with tumor grade. ER+ tumors were significantly more common among older patients. With IHC, PR+ cases were more common among tumors of lobular and mucinous type and among node positive tumors. The only parameter that was related to the concordance rate of ER determination by the DCC and IHC method was the age of the patients, with agreement being significantly lower in the group of patients younger than 50 years. On the other hand, discordant PR determination was more often observed in tumors of lower grade, node positive tumors and in tumors of lobular and mucinous type.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过葡聚糖包被活性炭法(DCC)和标准化免疫组织化学方法(IHC),对557例原发性乳腺癌的前瞻性系列病例进行雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)表达的测定,评估两种检测方法之间的一致性,并评估激素受体表达与各种临床病理参数之间的关联。对于ER,两种方法的结果在73.6%的病例中一致(277例阳性,133例阴性),74例肿瘤(13.3%)为IHC+/DCC-,73例(13.1%)为IHC-/DCC+。对于PR,72.7%的病例(201例阳性和204例阴性)观察到一致结果,127例肿瘤(22.8%)为IHC+/DCC-,25例(4.5%)为IHC-/DCC+。无论使用何种方法,ER和PR阳性均与肿瘤分级呈强烈负相关。ER+肿瘤在老年患者中明显更为常见。采用IHC检测时,PR+病例在小叶型和黏液型肿瘤以及淋巴结阳性肿瘤中更为常见。与DCC和IHC法测定ER的一致性率相关的唯一参数是患者年龄,在年龄小于50岁的患者组中一致性明显较低。另一方面,PR测定不一致的情况更常出现在低级别肿瘤、淋巴结阳性肿瘤以及小叶型和黏液型肿瘤中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验