Suppr超能文献

在右冠状动脉闭塞的患者中,顺行-逆行联合血液心脏停搏术并不比单独使用任何一种技术能更好地保护右心室。

Combined antegrade-retrograde blood cardioplegia does not protect right ventricle better than either technique alone in patients with occluded right coronary artery.

作者信息

Honkonen E L, Kaukinen L, Pehkonen E J, Kaukinen S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Medical School of the University of Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Scand Cardiovasc J. 1997;31(5):289-95. doi: 10.3109/14017439709069550.

Abstract

To study the hypothesis that combined antegrade-retrograde delivery of cardioplegia might overcome the limitations in myocardial protection of either technique alone, we compared the distribution of the different cardioplegic approaches by assessing myocardial cooling and evaluated the effects on right ventricular (RV) function in elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients with occluded right coronary artery (RCA). In a randomized trial, 15 patients received exclusively antegrade (ante group), 14 patients received exclusively retrograde (retro group) and 15 patients received combined, alternating antegrade-retrograde (combi group) cold blood cardioplegia. Myocardial temperatures were measured at four sites in the heart. Right ventricular function was assessed by determining the ejection fraction (fast-response thermodilution) and preload-related RV stroke work in repeated measurements. Myocardial cooling was similarly uneven and the posterior wall of the RV remained above 20 degrees C after all three methods of delivering hypothermic (5-7 degrees C) cardioplegia. The RV ejection fraction and preload-related (right atrial pressure) RV stroke work decreased postoperatively similarly in all groups. The results suggest that combined antegrade-retrograde cold blood cardioplegia could not provide more homogeneous myocardial cooling or better RV recovery than either technique alone in three-vessel-diseased CABG patients with occluded RCA.

摘要

为了研究顺行 - 逆行联合灌注心脏停搏液可能克服单独使用任何一种技术在心肌保护方面的局限性这一假设,我们通过评估心肌降温情况比较了不同心脏停搏液灌注方法的分布,并评估了在右冠状动脉(RCA)闭塞的择期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者中对右心室(RV)功能的影响。在一项随机试验中,15例患者仅接受顺行灌注(顺行组),14例患者仅接受逆行灌注(逆行组),15例患者接受顺行 - 逆行交替联合灌注(联合组)冷血心脏停搏液。在心脏的四个部位测量心肌温度。通过重复测量确定射血分数(快速响应热稀释法)和与前负荷相关的右心室搏功来评估右心室功能。在所有三种低温(5 - 7摄氏度)心脏停搏液灌注方法后,心肌降温同样不均匀,右心室后壁温度仍高于20摄氏度。所有组术后右心室射血分数和与前负荷相关的(右心房压力)右心室搏功均同样下降。结果表明,在三支血管病变且RCA闭塞的CABG患者中,顺行 - 逆行联合冷血心脏停搏液灌注并不能比单独使用任何一种技术提供更均匀的心肌降温或更好的右心室恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验