DeMaere J M, Ruby B C
Department of Health & Human Performance, University of Montana, Missoula 59812, USA.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1997 Sep;37(3):175-81.
The purpose of this study was to physiologically compare submaximal intensity deep water running (DWR) and treadmill running (TMR) exercise in trained athletes.
Pre-test, post-test, 2 x 2 factoral design.
Treadmill exercise tests occurred in the Human Performance Laboratory. DWR trials took place in the deep end of the University pool.
Seasonally trained college-aged male cross country runners (N = 8). Subjects completed a treadmill maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) test, followed by a submaximal treadmill and deep water run at heart rates equivalent to 60% and 80% treadmill VO2max.
Oxygen consumption (VO2), ventilation (VEstpd), rates of perceived exertion (RPE), energy expenditure (kcal.min-1), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), fat and carbohydrate oxidation (g.min-1) were measured during two 5 minute steady state stages for both trials.
The trial by intensity interaction for VEstpd was significant, demonstrating greater ventilation during DWR as compared to TMR at 80% VO2max. The main effect of trial demonstrated that significantly higher RER and carbohydrate oxidation, and lower fat oxidation occurred during DWR as compared to TMR. VO2, RPE, and energy expenditure did not differ significantly between trials.
DWR is a comparable form of submaximal intensity exercise as TMR in well-trained athletes. DWR does, however, maintain unique properties that differs it from TMR. Therefore, the concept of training specificity should be further considered when prescribing DWR and using it as an enhancement tool or substitute for dry land running.
本研究旨在对训练有素的运动员进行次最大强度深水池跑步(DWR)和跑步机跑步(TMR)运动的生理比较。
前测、后测、2×2析因设计。
跑步机运动测试在人体运动实验室进行。DWR测试在大学游泳池的深水区进行。
季节性训练的大学年龄男性越野跑运动员(N = 8)。受试者完成跑步机最大摄氧量(VO2max)测试,随后进行次最大强度的跑步机跑步和深水池跑步,心率分别相当于跑步机VO2max的60%和80%。
在两项测试的两个5分钟稳态阶段测量摄氧量(VO2)、通气量(VEstpd)、主观用力程度(RPE)、能量消耗(kcal·min-1)、呼吸交换率(RER)、脂肪和碳水化合物氧化量(g·min-1)。
VEstpd的强度与测试交互作用显著,表明在80%VO2max时,DWR期间的通气量比TMR更大。测试的主效应表明,与TMR相比,DWR期间的RER和碳水化合物氧化显著更高,脂肪氧化更低。VO2、RPE和能量消耗在两项测试之间没有显著差异。
在训练有素的运动员中,DWR是一种与TMR相当的次最大强度运动形式。然而,DWR确实具有与TMR不同的独特特性。因此,在规定DWR并将其用作增强工具或替代陆地跑步时,应进一步考虑训练特异性的概念。