• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体育运动中使用兴奋剂的流行病学研究方法。综述。

Epidemiologic approach of doping in sport. A review.

作者信息

Laure P

机构信息

Centre de Sociopharmacologie, Saint Max, France.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1997 Sep;37(3):218-24.

PMID:9407754
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine, the prevalence of doping in sport as it was reported by the athletes during surveys, and to try to isolate risk factors to resort to doping.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Medline, Pascal and Embase search for the period from 1980 to 1996.

STUDY SELECTION

Of the 44 studies produced, 15 were not included in the detailed data summary because they reported statistical data from antidoping controls, they were not enough specific, or they concerned horse races.

DATA EXTRACTION

Details of study design, drugs studied, prevalence. When available, were also noted: the sport practiced and the motives for doping.

RESULTS

Among children, doping prevalence in around 3-5%. Among adults, in self-reported use studies, doping prevalence may be estimated at 5-15%, where projected use studies report a mean prevalence near 15-25%. Studies provide few data about the sports that produce drug users.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of sport doping and its potential risks for health must make it to be considered as a problem of public health. This means that physicians must, at last, consider it as any other problem and change their behaviour against doping, in order not to reduce the subject to the sole list of prohibited substances. As for sports federations, they must, as last, recognize that prevalence of doping is high. Lastly, new studies are essential to determine motives for doping and to institute the predictable factors for this practice, what will perhaps make efficient the prevention campaigns.

摘要

目的

确定运动员在调查中报告的体育界使用兴奋剂的流行情况,并试图找出使用兴奋剂的风险因素。

实验设计

检索1980年至1996年期间的Medline、Pascal和Embase数据库。

研究选择

在得出的44项研究中,15项未纳入详细数据总结,因为它们报告的是反兴奋剂控制的统计数据,不够具体,或者涉及赛马。

数据提取

研究设计、所研究药物、流行情况的详细信息。如有可用信息,还记录了:从事的运动项目和使用兴奋剂的动机。

结果

在儿童中,兴奋剂使用流行率约为3%-5%。在成年人中,在自我报告使用情况的研究中,兴奋剂使用流行率估计为5%-15%,而预测使用情况的研究报告的平均流行率接近15%-25%。研究提供的关于产生药物使用者的运动项目的数据很少。

结论

体育界使用兴奋剂的程度及其对健康的潜在风险必须使其被视为一个公共卫生问题。这意味着医生最终必须像对待其他任何问题一样看待它,并改变他们对使用兴奋剂的态度,以免将这个问题仅仅局限于违禁物质清单。至于体育联合会,它们最终必须认识到使用兴奋剂的流行率很高。最后,新的研究对于确定使用兴奋剂的动机和找出这种行为的可预测因素至关重要,这可能会使预防运动更加有效。

相似文献

1
Epidemiologic approach of doping in sport. A review.体育运动中使用兴奋剂的流行病学研究方法。综述。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1997 Sep;37(3):218-24.
2
Prevalence, knowledge and attitude of prohibited substances use (doping) among Saudi sport players.沙特体育运动员中违禁药物使用(兴奋剂)的流行情况、认知及态度
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2016 Apr 16;11:14. doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0058-1.
3
[Prevention of doping in sport in adolescents: evaluation of a health education based intervention].[青少年体育领域反兴奋剂:基于健康教育的干预措施评估]
Arch Pediatr. 1999 Aug;6(8):849-54. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(00)88478-x.
4
[Doping in sport].[体育界的兴奋剂问题]
Med Klin (Munich). 2007 Aug 15;102(8):631-46. doi: 10.1007/s00063-007-1079-3.
5
[Doping: epidemiological studies].[兴奋剂:流行病学研究]
Presse Med. 2000;29(24):1365-72.
6
[Doctors belonging to the Senegalese Association of Sport Medicine and doping in sports: survey on knowledge and attitudes].[塞内加尔运动医学协会医生与体育界的兴奋剂问题:知识与态度调查]
Sante. 2005 Jul-Sep;15(3):167-70.
7
[General practitioners and doping in sports: knowledge and attitudes].[全科医生与体育界的兴奋剂问题:知识与态度]
Sante Publique. 1997 Jun;9(2):145-56.
8
An (un)desirable trade of harms? How elite athletes might react to medically supervised 'doping' and their considerations of side-effects in this situation.一种(非)理想的伤害交换?精英运动员在这种情况下对医学监督的“兴奋剂”可能会做出何种反应,以及他们对副作用的考虑。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 May;55:14-30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
Psychological and social correlates of doping attitudes among Italian athletes.意大利运动员的兴奋剂态度的心理和社会相关因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Feb;26(2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
10
Differential analysis of the doping behaviour templates in three types of sports.三种运动中兴奋剂使用行为模板的差异分析
Coll Antropol. 2013 May;37 Suppl 2:211-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of the Current Anti-doping Regime - A Quantitative Study Among German Top-Level Cyclists and Track and Field Athletes.对当前反兴奋剂制度的认知——一项针对德国顶级自行车运动员和田径运动员的定量研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 16;9:1890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01890. eCollection 2018.
2
The complexities of anti-doping violations: a case study of sanctioned cases in all performance levels of USA cycling.反兴奋剂违规行为的复杂性:以美国自行车运动各级别受制裁案例为例
Perform Enhanc Health. 2014 Sep-Dec;3(3-4):159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.peh.2015.08.001.
3
(Self-)Surveillance, Anti-Doping, and Health in Non-Elite Road Running.
非精英公路跑中的(自我)监测、反兴奋剂与健康
Surveill Soc. 2014;11(4):494-507.
4
Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods.精英体育中使用兴奋剂的流行情况:数量与方法综述
Sports Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0247-x.
5
Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis.个人和心理社会因素对体力活动中兴奋剂使用的预测:荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2014 Nov;44(11):1603-24. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0240-4.
6
Doping and performance enhancing drug use in athletes living in sivas, mid-anatolia: a brief report.运动员在中安纳托利亚的锡瓦斯生活中的兴奋剂和增强性能药物使用:简要报告。
J Sports Sci Med. 2005 Sep 1;4(3):248-52.
7
Comfort in big numbers: Does over-estimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement?众人皆醉我独醒?高估他人兴奋剂使用情况或表明自身涉药?
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008 Sep 5;3:19. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-3-19.
8
[Doping. High-tech cheating in sport].[兴奋剂。体育界的高科技作弊行为]
Internist (Berl). 2007 Jul;48(7):737-42. doi: 10.1007/s00108-007-1842-9.
9
Banned drugs in sport. Does the International Olympic Committee (IOC) list need updating?体育赛事中的违禁药物。国际奥委会(IOC)的禁药清单需要更新吗?
Sports Med. 1999 Jan;27(1):1-10. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199927010-00001.