• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Adverse outcomes of managed care gatekeeping.

作者信息

Young G P, Lowe R A

机构信息

Emergency Department, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Eugene, OR 97401, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Dec;4(12):1129-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03695.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03695.x
PMID:9408428
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether telephone preauthorization for reimbursement of ED care (medical "gate-keeping") by managed care organizations (MCOs) is associated with adverse outcomes.

METHODS

A structured review was performed of case reports solicited during 1994 and 1995 with possible adverse outcomes related to managed care gatekeeping. Gatekeeping was defined as the requirement imposed by an MCO that ED staff contact on-call gatekeepers (i.e., clinical or nonclinical MCO personnel) to request preauthorization for ED treatment (a requirement that such MCOs enforce by refusing payment for the ED care unless preauthorization is obtained). Cases in which gatekeeper denial of preauthorization occurred were sought. Two physicians agreed on patient eligibility and classification criteria, then independently, retrospectively classified case reports identified as MCO ED payment denials into 1 of 4 categories: 1) adverse outcome; 2) patient placed at increased risk of death or disability; 3) "near miss" (emergency physicians prevented adverse outcome by caring for patient despite denial); and 4) none of the above.

RESULTS

Of the 143 cases reviewed, 29 reports represented MCO ED payment denial. Of these 29 eligible cases, there were 4 (14%) patients with adverse outcomes, 4 (14%) patients placed at increased risk, and 21 (72%) near misses. All of the 29 cases came from different EDs, representing 9 different states, with the majority from California. Adverse outcomes included respiratory failure from fulminant meningococcemia, hypovolemic syncope from ruptured ectopic pregnancy, hypovolemic arrest from vascular fibroid hemorrhage necessitating emergency hysterectomy, and prolonged postoperative course following ruptured duodenal ulcer. Patients placed at increased risk were diagnosed as having epiglottitis, myocardial infarction, ruptured ectopic pregnancy, and delayed treatment of hip septic arthritis. Near misses included diagnoses of ectopic pregnancy (n = 2), pneumothorax (n = 2), alcohol withdrawal seizures and pancreatitis necessitating intensive care unit admission, appendicitis, bacterial meningitis, cerebrovascular accident, cryptococal meningitis in immuno comprised host, endocarditis, incarerated inguinal hernia, meningocococemia, meninoccocal meningitis, peritonsillar abscess, pneumococcal meningitis, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, shock from gastrointestinal bleeding, small bowel obstruction, schizophrenic crisis resulting in psychiatric hospitalization, suicidal depression resulting in psychiatric hospitalization, and unstable angina.

CONCLUSION

Adverse outcomes occur with MCO gatekeeping, Although the present study cannot ascertain whether this is a frequent event or a rare one, the safety of MCO gatekeeping deserves further study.

摘要

相似文献

1
Adverse outcomes of managed care gatekeeping.
Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Dec;4(12):1129-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03695.x.
2
Managed care gatekeeping, emergency medicine coding, and insurance reimbursement outcomes for 980 emergency department visits from four states nationwide.来自全国四个州的980次急诊科就诊的管理式医疗守门、急诊医学编码及保险报销结果。
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;39(1):24-30. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.118864.
3
Managed care organization authorization denials: lack of patient knowledge and timely alternative ambulatory care.
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;35(3):272-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70079-5.
4
Effect of ethnicity on denial of authorization for emergency department care by managed care gatekeepers.种族对管理式医疗把关人拒绝急诊科护理授权的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;8(3):259-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01302.x.
5
Results of provider self-adjudication using the prudent layperson standard compared with the managed care organization's emergency department claim review process.使用审慎外行标准进行的医疗服务提供者自我裁决结果与管理式医疗组织的急诊科索赔审查流程的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Sep;36(3):212-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.109167.
6
Managed health plan effects on the specialty referral process: results from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network referral study.管理式健康计划对专科转诊流程的影响:门诊哨点实践网络转诊研究结果
Med Care. 2003 Feb;41(2):242-53. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000044903.91168.B6.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Managed care and the pediatric emergency department.管理式医疗与儿科急诊科。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1999 Dec;46(6):1329-40. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70188-7.
9
Diverting managed care Medicaid patients from pediatric emergency department use.引导管理式医疗的医疗补助计划患者减少儿科急诊科的使用。
Pediatrics. 1995 Feb;95(2):170-8.
10
Primary care physician access and gatekeeping: a key to reducing emergency department use.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997 Feb;36(2):63-8. doi: 10.1177/000992289703600201.

引用本文的文献

1
Gatekeeping or Provider Choice for Sustainable Health Systems? A Literature Review on Their Impact on Efficiency, Access, and Quality of Services.可持续卫生系统中的守门人制度还是提供者选择?关于其对服务效率、可及性和质量影响的文献综述
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Dec 6;12(4):378-387. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12040029. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Effects of Medicaid managed care on early detection of cancer: Evidence from mandatory Medicaid managed care program in Pennsylvania.医疗补助管理式医疗对癌症早期检测的影响:来自宾夕法尼亚州强制性医疗补助管理式医疗计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14348. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14348. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
3
A Policy Statement on Cardiovascular Test Substitution and Authorization: Principles of Patient-Centered Noninvasive Testing.
关于心血管检查替代与授权的政策声明:以患者为中心的无创检查原则
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep 28;78(13):1385-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.043.
4
Analysis of a Commercial Insurance Policy to Deny Coverage for Emergency Department Visits With Nonemergent Diagnoses.分析一份商业保险政策,该政策拒绝为非紧急诊断的急诊科就诊提供保险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183731. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3731.
5
Effect of Patient Experience on Bypassing a Primary Care Gatekeeper: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study in Japan.患者体验对绕过初级保健守门人的影响:日本多中心前瞻性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):722-728. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4245-1. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
6
Cost containment and patient well-being.成本控制与患者福祉。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jun;30(6):701-2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3219-4.
7
Association of Medicare and Medicaid insurance with increasing primary care-treatable emergency department visits in the United States.美国医疗保险和医疗补助保险与初级保健可治疗的急诊就诊增加之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1135-42. doi: 10.1111/acem.12490.
8
Measuring adverse events in helicopter emergency medical services: establishing content validity.测量直升机紧急医疗服务中的不良事件:建立内容效度。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):35-45. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.818179. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
9
Comparison of presenting complaint vs discharge diagnosis for identifying " nonemergency" emergency department visits.比较就诊主诉与出院诊断,以识别“非紧急”急诊科就诊。
JAMA. 2013 Mar 20;309(11):1145-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.1948.
10
Effectiveness of organizational interventions to reduce emergency department utilization: a systematic review.组织干预措施降低急诊科利用效果的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035903. Epub 2012 May 2.