Hugdahl K, Hammar A
Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Oct;19(5):667-75. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403752.
The present study compared test-retest reliability for dichotic listening (DL) performance to consonant-vowel (CV) syllables under three different attentional instructions. Previous studies of reliability in dichotic listening have shown great variability which most likely reflects the large variations in stimuli, procedures, and techniques used in the different studies. Sixteen subjects were tested twice, 2 weeks apart, with the same dichotic listening procedure, including a divided attention condition and two focused attention conditions on each test occasion. The results showed test-retest correlations ranging from .61 to .86 for the three attentional conditions, with the smallest correlation coefficient for the divided attention condition.
本研究比较了在三种不同注意力指导下,对辅音-元音(CV)音节进行双耳分听(DL)表现的重测信度。先前关于双耳分听信度的研究显示出很大的变异性,这很可能反映了不同研究中所使用的刺激、程序和技术的巨大差异。16名受试者在间隔两周的时间内接受了两次相同的双耳分听测试,每次测试都包括一个分散注意力条件和两个集中注意力条件。结果显示,三种注意力条件下的重测相关性在0.61至0.86之间,其中分散注意力条件下的相关系数最小。