Auger J
Service d'Histologie-Embryologie/Biologie de la Reproduction et CECOS, Groupe Hospitalier Cochin-Port-Royal, Paris.
Contracept Fertil Sex. 1997 Jul-Aug;25(7-8):524-9.
After the meta-analysis by Carlsen et al. (1992) showing a decline in human sperm count over the last 50 years, several studies have been made on the sperm characteristics of more or less homogeneous groups of men who were collecting semen in the same center for 10-20 years. A significant decline in sperm count was reported in some studies but not in others. The debate on declining sperm counts is not closed and these studies raised the following important questions: could the differences in results be the reflect of variation in techniques or blas in methodologies? If these phenomena are real, why a deterioration of semen quality in some places and not in others with so important geographical differences of sperm production? What are the possible consequences on human fertility and what are the causes? Unfortunately, there is presently no answer. The danish study provoked extensive discussion on the many possible sources of bias while there was less controversy concerning the studies carried out in a single center despite the extent of limitations of several of them. Recent publications indicated concomitant and increasing alterations of the development and/or function of the male genital tract, various observations in the wildlife and several experimental studies suggesting the possible deleterious role of numerous chemical compounds present in our environment. Therefore, prospective epidemiological studies and fundamental researchs are urgently needed.
卡尔森等人在1992年进行的荟萃分析显示,在过去50年里人类精子数量呈下降趋势,此后,针对在同一中心采集精液长达10至20年的男性组成的或多或少具有同质性的群体的精子特征开展了多项研究。一些研究报告了精子数量显著下降,但另一些研究则没有。关于精子数量下降的争论尚未结束,这些研究引发了以下重要问题:结果的差异是否可能反映了技术差异或方法偏差?如果这些现象是真实的,为什么在精子产生存在如此大地理差异的情况下,精液质量在某些地方恶化而在其他地方却没有?对人类生育能力可能有哪些后果,原因又是什么?不幸的是,目前尚无答案。丹麦的这项研究引发了对众多可能偏差来源的广泛讨论,而尽管在单一中心开展的多项研究存在诸多局限性,但这些研究引发的争议较少。最近的出版物表明,男性生殖道的发育和/或功能同时出现了越来越多的改变,野生动物中的各种观察结果以及多项实验研究表明,我们环境中存在的众多化合物可能具有有害作用。因此,迫切需要开展前瞻性流行病学研究和基础研究。