Swan S H, Elkin E P, Fenster L
Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65212, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Oct;108(10):961-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108961.
In 1992 Carlsen et al. reported a significant global decline in sperm density between 1938 and 1990 [Evidence for Decreasing Quality of Semen during Last 50 Years. Br Med J 305:609-613 (1992)]. We subsequently published a reanalysis of the studies included by Carlsen et al. [Swan et al. Have Sperm Densities Declined? A Reanalysis of Global Trend Data. Environ Health Perspect 105:1228-1232 (1997)]. In that analysis we found significant declines in sperm density in the United States and Europe/Australia after controlling for abstinence time, age, percent of men with proven fertility, and specimen collection method. The declines in sperm density in the United States (approximately 1.5%/year) and Europe/Australia (approximately 3%/year) were somewhat greater than the average decline reported by Carlsen et al. (approximately 1%/year). However, we found no decline in sperm density in non-Western countries, for which data were very limited. In the current study, we used similar methods to analyze an expanded set of studies. We added 47 English language studies published in 1934-1996 to those we had analyzed previously. The average decline in sperm count was virtually unchanged from that reported previously by Carlsen et al. (slope = -0.94 vs. -0.93). The slopes in the three geographic groupings were also similar to those we reported earlier. In North America, the slope was somewhat less than the slope we had found for the United States (slope = -0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.37--0.24). Similarly, the decline in Europe (slope = -2.35; CI, -3.66--1.05) was somewhat less than reported previously. As before, studies from other countries showed no trend (slope = -0.21; CI, -2.30-1.88). These results are consistent with those of Carlsen et al. and our previous results, suggesting that the reported trends are not dependent on the particular studies included by Carlsen et al. and that the observed trends previously reported for 1938-1990 are also seen in data from 1934-1996.
1992年,卡尔森等人报告称,1938年至1990年间全球精子密度显著下降[过去50年精液质量下降的证据。《英国医学杂志》305:609 - 613(1992)]。随后,我们发表了对卡尔森等人所纳入研究的重新分析[斯旺等人。精子密度下降了吗?全球趋势数据的重新分析。《环境健康展望》105:1228 - 1232(1997)]。在该分析中,我们发现,在控制禁欲时间、年龄、已证实有生育能力男性的比例以及样本采集方法后,美国和欧洲/澳大利亚的精子密度显著下降。美国(约每年1.5%)和欧洲/澳大利亚(约每年3%)的精子密度下降幅度略大于卡尔森等人报告的平均下降幅度(约每年1%)。然而,我们发现非西方国家的精子密度没有下降,因为这些国家的数据非常有限。在当前研究中,我们使用类似方法分析了一组扩充的研究。我们在之前分析的研究基础上增加了47项1934 - 1996年发表的英文研究。精子数量的平均下降幅度与卡尔森等人之前报告的基本相同(斜率 = -0.94对 -0.93)。三个地理区域分组的斜率也与我们之前报告的相似。在北美,斜率略低于我们在美国发现的斜率(斜率 = -0.80;95%置信区间(CI),-1.37 - -0.24)。同样,欧洲的下降幅度(斜率 = -2.35;CI,-3.66 - -1.05)略低于之前报告的幅度。和之前一样,其他国家的研究没有显示出趋势(斜率 = -0.21;CI,-2.30 - 1.88)。这些结果与卡尔森等人的结果以及我们之前的结果一致,表明所报告的趋势并不取决于卡尔森等人所纳入的特定研究,并且之前报告的1938 - 1990年观察到的趋势在1934 - 1996年的数据中也可见。