van't Wout A B, Ran L J, de Jong M D, Bakker M, van Leeuwen R, Notermans D W, Loeliger A E, de Wolf F, Danner S A, Reiss P, Boucher C A, Lange J M, Schuitemaker H
Department of Clinical Viro-Immunology, Central Laboratory of the Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Invest. 1997 Nov 1;100(9):2325-32. doi: 10.1172/JCI119771.
By studying changes in the clonal composition of HIV-1 populations during the first weeks of zidovudine (ZDV) treatment before the development of ZDV resistance-conferring mutations, we demonstrated previously a selective inhibition of nonsyncytium-inducing (NSI) HIV-1, even when present as coexisting population in individuals also harboring syncytium-inducing (SI) HIV-1. In this study, we observed the opposite in individuals receiving didanosine (ddI) treatment. In these individuals (n = 7) a median -0.98 log change (range -1.55-0.08) in infectious cellular SI load was observed, whereas the coexisting NSI load was only minimally affected (median -0.15 log, range -1.27-0.50; P = 0.03). The virus phenotype-dependent treatment responses were independent of the clonal composition of HIV-1 populations at baseline. Individuals treated with a combination of ZDV and ddI revealed an equal decline of both NSI and SI infectious cellular load (n = 4; NSI: median -1.55 log, range -2.19 to -1.45; SI: median -1.47 log, range -1.81 to -0.86; P = 0.56). To test the hypothesis that the previously reported optimal activation of ZDV and ddI in activated and resting T cells, respectively, in combination with the differential T cell tropism of NSI and SI HIV-1 is the basis for the observed virus phenotype specific efficacy of nucleoside analogs, we studied the effect of treatment with a protease inhibitor that does not require intracellular activation. Individuals receiving ritonavir (n = 4) indeed showed equal declines in NSI and SI infectious cellular load (NSI: median -2.37 log, range -2.59 to -2.16; SI: median -2.82 log, range -3.14 to -2.50; P = 0.25). Our data suggest HIV-1 phenotype as an additional parameter in the design of optimal treatment regimens.
通过研究齐多夫定(ZDV)治疗最初几周内HIV-1群体克隆组成的变化(在赋予ZDV耐药性的突变出现之前),我们先前证明了对非合胞体诱导型(NSI)HIV-1有选择性抑制作用,即便在同时携带有合胞体诱导型(SI)HIV-1的个体中NSI HIV-1作为共存群体存在时也是如此。在本研究中,我们在接受去羟肌苷(ddI)治疗的个体中观察到了相反的情况。在这些个体(n = 7)中,观察到感染性细胞SI载量中位数有-0.98 log的变化(范围为-1.55至0.08),而共存的NSI载量仅受到极小影响(中位数为-0.15 log,范围为-1.27至0.50;P = 0.03)。病毒表型依赖性治疗反应与基线时HIV-1群体的克隆组成无关。接受ZDV和ddI联合治疗的个体显示NSI和SI感染性细胞载量均有同等程度下降(n = 4;NSI:中位数为-1.55 log,范围为-2.19至-1.45;SI:中位数为-1.47 log,范围为-1.81至-0.86;P = 0.56)。为了检验先前报道的ZDV和ddI分别在活化T细胞和静息T细胞中的最佳活化作用,以及NSI和SI HIV-1不同的T细胞嗜性是核苷类似物观察到的病毒表型特异性疗效基础这一假设,我们研究了一种无需细胞内活化的蛋白酶抑制剂的治疗效果。接受利托那韦治疗的个体(n = 4)确实显示NSI和SI感染性细胞载量有同等程度下降(NSI:中位数为-2.37 log,范围为-2.59至-2.16;SI:中位数为-2.82 log,范围为-3.14至-2.50;P = 0.25)。我们的数据表明HIV-1表型是优化治疗方案设计中的一个额外参数。