Herranz Amo F, Díez Cordero J M, Verdú Tartajo F, Lledo García E, Jara Rascón J, González Chamorro F, Rodríguez Fernández E
Servicio de Urologá, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid.
Actas Urol Esp. 1997 Jun;21(6):590-7.
To evaluate the value of rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and their association in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Retrospective study on 56 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1995-1995, mean age 63.2 +/- 10 years, to compare local clinical staging of extracapsular dissemination and seminal vesicle invasion performed by rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound with pathological findings in the prostatectomy specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, VPP, VPN, accuracy and percentage of under- and over-staged patients were assessed.
Prevalence of locally advanced disease was 48%. Sensitivity to detect extracapsular dissemination was significantly higher with ultrasound (38%) than rectal examination (6%). Association of both techniques increased the sensitivity (50%) though not significantly; sensitivity to detect vesicle invasion was very low (14%). Accuracy of ultrasound to establish an overall definition of the local stage was 66%, but 59% patients with locally advanced disease were understaged and only 10% patients with localized disease were overstaged.
Transrectal ultrasound showed low sensitivity to define the locally advanced disease mainly at the seminal vesicle level, with acceptable specificity. Overall evaluation of findings with RE and TRU increase discreetly the efficacy of prostate capsule staging.