• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似急性阑尾炎的诊断决策支持:一种简化评分系统的验证

Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system.

作者信息

Fenyö G, Lindberg G, Blind P, Enochsson L, Oberg A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Nacka Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 1997 Nov;163(11):831-8.

PMID:9414043
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate a simplified scoring system as an aid to the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

DESIGN

Open prospective study.

SETTING

County district hospital, and university hospital, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

1167 Patients with suspected appendicitis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlation between scoring system and final diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 475 patients were operated on and 392 (82.5%) of these had histologically verified appendicitis. The negative laparotomy rate was 17.5% (11.2% for men and 25.4% for women). The sensitivity of the scoring system for appendicitis at the main cut-off point (score -2 or more) was 0.73 and the specificity was 0.87. At the cut-off level (score - 17 or less) for predicting non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) the proportion of correctly classified patients was 0.72 and the proportion of false negatives (patients with appendicitis classified as NSAP) was 0.14. Analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the scoring system performed slightly worse in the university hospital (area 0.83) than in the district hospital where it was originally developed (area 0.89).

CONCLUSION

The scoring system was a valid instrument for discriminating between acute appendicitis and NSAP in the two centres studied. Use of the scoring system in daily clinical work was associated with a reduced rate of negative laparotomies.

摘要

目的

验证一种简化评分系统,以辅助急性阑尾炎的诊断。

设计

开放性前瞻性研究。

地点

瑞典的县级医院和大学医院。

研究对象

1167例疑似阑尾炎患者。

主要观察指标

评分系统与最终诊断之间的相关性。

结果

共有475例患者接受了手术,其中392例(82.5%)经组织学证实为阑尾炎。阴性剖腹率为17.5%(男性为11.2%,女性为25.4%)。评分系统在主要分界点(评分-2或更高)时对阑尾炎的敏感性为0.73,特异性为0.87。在预测非特异性腹痛(NSAP)的分界水平(评分-17或更低)时,正确分类患者的比例为0.72,假阴性比例(阑尾炎被分类为NSAP的患者)为0.14。对受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的分析表明,评分系统在大学医院(面积0.83)的表现略逊于其最初研发的地区医院(面积0.89)。

结论

在本研究的两个中心,评分系统是区分急性阑尾炎和NSAP的有效工具。在日常临床工作中使用评分系统与阴性剖腹率降低相关。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system.疑似急性阑尾炎的诊断决策支持:一种简化评分系统的验证
Eur J Surg. 1997 Nov;163(11):831-8.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.疑似急性阑尾炎手术患者炎症标志物的诊断准确性:受试者工作特征曲线分析
Eur J Surg. 1999 Jul;165(7):679-85. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189744.
3
Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults.在疑似成人急性阑尾炎的决策中常规使用评分系统。
Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Sep;153(9):545-51.
4
Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort.使用前瞻性儿科队列评估阑尾炎评分系统。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):778-84, 784.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.12.016. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
5
Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group.急性阑尾炎的诊断评分。腹痛研究组。
Eur J Surg. 1995 Apr;161(4):273-81.
6
Estimating the probability of acute appendicitis using clinical criteria of a structured record sheet: the physician against the computer.使用结构化记录表的临床标准评估急性阑尾炎的概率:医生与计算机的对比。
Eur J Surg. 1997 Jun;163(6):427-32.
7
Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department.加拿大儿科急诊科小儿阑尾炎评分的前瞻性验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):591-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00445.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
8
Additional value of biochemical tests in suspected acute appendicitis.生化检查在疑似急性阑尾炎中的附加价值。
Eur J Surg. 1997 Jul;163(7):533-8.
9
[Can diagnostic scoring systems help decision making in primary care of patients with suspected acute appendicitis?].[诊断评分系统能否有助于疑似急性阑尾炎患者的基层医疗决策?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 May 7;124(18):545-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024357.
10
Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis?为什么疑似阑尾炎的临床诊断会失败?
Eur J Surg. 2000 Oct;166(10):796-802. doi: 10.1080/110241500447434.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation and Comparison of Pediatric Appendicitis Scores and Management Strategies (Project SPASMS): Protocol for a Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.小儿阑尾炎评分与管理策略的验证与比较(SPASMS项目):一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 27;14:e67941. doi: 10.2196/67941.
2
A Comparison of the Alvarado Score and the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.阿尔瓦拉多评分与拉贾·伊斯特里·彭吉兰·阿娜克·萨利哈阑尾炎(RIPASA)评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e68041. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68041. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Value of Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎诊断中的价值。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 19;77:103642. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103642. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.急性阑尾炎——进展与争议
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov 27;13(11):1293-1314. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1293.
5
Which appendicitis scoring system is most suitable for pregnant patients? A comparison of nine different systems.哪种阑尾炎评分系统最适合孕妇?九种不同系统的比较。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 May 18;15(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00310-7.
6
Comparative Study of Alvarado Score and its Modifications in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis at a Tertiary Center in Sokoto, Nigeria.阿尔瓦拉多评分及其修正版在尼日利亚索科托一家三级中心急性阑尾炎术前诊断中的比较研究
Niger J Surg. 2020 Jan-Jun;26(1):16-21. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_46_19. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
Survey of efficacy of pediatric appendicitis score in Iranian patients less than 18 years old referred to the emergency department.针对转诊至急诊科的18岁以下伊朗患者的小儿阑尾炎评分疗效调查。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Nov 15;8(11):3700-3705. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_740_19. eCollection 2019 Nov.
8
Evaluation of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分在诊断急性阑尾炎中的评估
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Sep 6;34:15. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.15.17803. eCollection 2019.
9
Evaluation of the predictive power of laboratory markers in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly.评估实验室指标对老年急性阑尾炎诊断的预测能力。
North Clin Istanb. 2019 Jul 8;6(3):293-301. doi: 10.14744/nci.2019.93457. eCollection 2019.
10
Ruling out Appendicitis in Children: Can We Use Clinical Prediction Rules?排除儿童阑尾炎:我们能否使用临床预测规则?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):2027-2048. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3997-1. Epub 2018 Oct 29.