• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在疑似成人急性阑尾炎的决策中常规使用评分系统。

Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults.

作者信息

Fenyö G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Nacka Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Sep;153(9):545-51.

PMID:3321809
Abstract

Clinical data from 259 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were prospectively collected and used in construction of a Bayesian scoring system, comprising 19 attributes, for preoperative diagnosis. The scoring system was integrated into the routine clinical management of a prospective series of 830 patients. Laparotomy was performed in 310 cases, and of these 256 had acute appendicitis (perforation in 14%). Excluding 6 cases with normal appendix but laparotomy mandatory for other reasons, the negative laparotomy rate was 15.5%. This rate was significantly lower than in earlier series from the same hospital and in more than 8,000 appendectomies performed in Sweden since 1969. The scoring system had 90.2% sensitivity, 91.4% specificity, 82.5% positive predictive value and 95.4% negative predictive value. The system is regarded only as an aid in diagnosis, to be used in combination with clinicians' judgements. Construction of a local data base probably is essential for results equivalent to those here reported.

摘要

前瞻性收集了259例疑似急性阑尾炎患者的临床数据,并将其用于构建一个包含19个属性的贝叶斯评分系统,用于术前诊断。该评分系统被纳入一个前瞻性系列830例患者的常规临床管理中。310例患者接受了剖腹手术,其中256例患有急性阑尾炎(14%为穿孔性)。排除6例阑尾正常但因其他原因必须进行剖腹手术的病例后,阴性剖腹手术率为15.5%。该比率显著低于同一医院早期系列以及自1969年以来在瑞典进行的8000多例阑尾切除术中的比率。该评分系统的灵敏度为90.2%,特异度为91.4%,阳性预测值为82.5%,阴性预测值为95.4%。该系统仅被视为诊断辅助工具,需与临床医生的判断结合使用。构建本地数据库可能对于获得与本文报告相当的结果至关重要。

相似文献

1
Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults.在疑似成人急性阑尾炎的决策中常规使用评分系统。
Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Sep;153(9):545-51.
2
Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system.疑似急性阑尾炎的诊断决策支持:一种简化评分系统的验证
Eur J Surg. 1997 Nov;163(11):831-8.
3
[Can diagnostic scoring systems help decision making in primary care of patients with suspected acute appendicitis?].[诊断评分系统能否有助于疑似急性阑尾炎患者的基层医疗决策?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 May 7;124(18):545-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024357.
4
Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies.急性阑尾炎计算机辅助诊断评分系统。前瞻性研究与回顾性研究的价值。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(4):159-66.
5
The continuing challenge of the negative appendix.阴性阑尾的持续挑战。
Acta Chir Scand. 1986 Oct;152:623-7.
6
[Suspected appendicitis: immediate surgery or observation?].[疑似阑尾炎:立即手术还是观察?]
Helv Chir Acta. 1989 Jun;56(1-2):205-7.
7
[The role of peritoneal aspiration cytology diagnosis of acute appendicitis].[腹腔穿刺细胞学诊断在急性阑尾炎中的作用]
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2003 Apr;9(2):107-10.
8
Accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis by comparing serum C-reactive protein measurements, Alvarado score and clinical impression of surgeons.通过比较血清C反应蛋白测量值、阿尔瓦拉多评分和外科医生的临床印象来诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Mar;87(3):296-303.
9
Diagnostic accuracy and short-term surgical outcomes in cases of suspected acute appendicitis.疑似急性阑尾炎病例的诊断准确性及短期手术结果
CMAJ. 1995 May 15;152(10):1617-26.
10
[A prospective study of 776 cases of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain. Acute appendicitis and its diagnosis].[776例急性非创伤性腹痛的前瞻性研究。急性阑尾炎及其诊断]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Aug 15;117(33):1205-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Many diagnostic tools for appendicitis: a scoping review.许多用于阑尾炎诊断的工具:范围综述。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3419-3429. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09890-2. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Survey of efficacy of pediatric appendicitis score in Iranian patients less than 18 years old referred to the emergency department.针对转诊至急诊科的18岁以下伊朗患者的小儿阑尾炎评分疗效调查。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Nov 15;8(11):3700-3705. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_740_19. eCollection 2019 Nov.
3
Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis.
成人疑似阑尾炎患者阑尾炎风险预测模型的评估。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11440. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
Evaluation of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分在诊断急性阑尾炎中的评估
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Sep 6;34:15. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.15.17803. eCollection 2019.
5
Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?成人阑尾炎的临床预测规则:哪一种最佳?
World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1769-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3926-6.
6
A systematic review of studies comparing diagnostic clinical prediction rules with clinical judgment.比较诊断临床预测规则与临床判断的研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0128233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128233. eCollection 2015.
7
Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的手术决策
BMC Surg. 2015 Jun 2;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x.
8
Can the efficiency of modified Alvarado scoring system in the diagnosis acute appendicitis be increased with tenesmus?是否可以通过里急后重增加改良 Alvarado 评分系统在诊断急性阑尾炎中的效率?
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013 Jan;125(1-2):16-20. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0308-9. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
9
The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review.阿尔瓦拉多评分预测急性阑尾炎:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2011 Dec 28;9:139. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-139.
10
A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.一种准确诊断急性阑尾炎的新方法。
World J Surg. 2005 Sep;29(9):1151-6, discussion 1157. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7853-6.