• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

声学杀伤人员武器:会是不人道的未来吗?

Acoustic anti-personnel weapons: an inhumane future?

作者信息

Arkin W M

出版信息

Med Confl Surviv. 1997 Oct-Dec;13(4):314-26. doi: 10.1080/13623699708409355.

DOI:10.1080/13623699708409355
PMID:9414958
Abstract

High intensity sound is foremost among newer technologies being considered by the military for use in war weaponry and in control of civil disorder, particularly in the United States where some weapons may be nearing deployment. The various forms of acoustic energy and the weapons in which they could be applied are considered, and the adverse effects on humans described; these can be serious and persistent, and are potentially lethal. Military applications for which high energy sound has been contemplated in the past or are being considered for the future are examined, and some existing research projects reviewed. Such uses of acoustic energy in war are criticized in the light of the obligation imposed by existing international humanitarian law for weapons not to cause 'unnecessary suffering' or 'superfluous injury'. The humanitarian community must advocate greater humanitarian protection in warfare.

摘要

高强度声音是军方正在考虑用于战争武器和控制内乱的较新技术中最为重要的一种,尤其是在美国,一些此类武器可能即将部署。文中考虑了各种形式的声能及其可应用的武器,并描述了其对人类的不利影响;这些影响可能严重且持久,甚至可能致命。文中审视了过去曾考虑或未来正考虑的高能声音的军事应用,并回顾了一些现有研究项目。鉴于现行国际人道法规定武器不得造成“不必要的痛苦”或“过度伤害”,此类声能在战争中的使用受到了批评。人道界必须倡导在战争中提供更多的人道保护。

相似文献

1
Acoustic anti-personnel weapons: an inhumane future?声学杀伤人员武器:会是不人道的未来吗?
Med Confl Surviv. 1997 Oct-Dec;13(4):314-26. doi: 10.1080/13623699708409355.
2
Setting the scene: the new conflict environment and contemporary challenges for interventionists.场景设定:新的冲突环境及干预主义者面临的当代挑战。
Med Confl Surviv. 2002 Jan-Mar;18(1):5-22. doi: 10.1080/13623690208409602.
3
Humanitarian action and military intervention: temptations and possibilities.人道主义行动与军事干预:诱惑与可能性
Disasters. 2004 Jun;28(2):205-15. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00253.x.
4
International law and law enforcement firearms.国际法与执法用枪支。
Med Confl Surviv. 2004 Jan-Mar;20(1):55-69. doi: 10.1080/13623690412331302294.
5
Implementation of evidence-based humanitarian programs in military-led missions: part I. Qualitative gap analysis of current military and international aid programs.在军事主导任务中实施循证人道主义项目:第一部分。当前军事和国际援助项目的定性差距分析。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Dec;2(4):230-6. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818d3c80.
6
Dilemmas and controversies within civilian and military organizations in the execution of humanitarian aid in Iraq: a review.伊拉克境内平民和军事组织在执行人道主义援助过程中的困境与争议:一项综述
Am J Disaster Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;5(6):385-91.
7
A framework for the assessment of non-lethal weapons.
Med Confl Surviv. 2004 Jan-Mar;20(1):35-54. doi: 10.1080/13623690412331302284.
8
States of fragility: stabilisation and its implications for humanitarian action.脆弱国家状况:稳定化及其对人道主义行动的影响。
Disasters. 2010 Oct;34 Suppl 3:S275-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01206.x.
9
'Non-lethal' weapons and international law: three perspectives on the future.
Med Confl Surviv. 2001 Jul-Sep;17(3):194-206. doi: 10.1080/13623690108409579.
10
An overview of the future of non-lethal weapons.非致命性武器的未来概述。
Med Confl Surviv. 2001 Jul-Sep;17(3):180-93. doi: 10.1080/13623690108409578.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality associated with use of weapons in armed conflicts, wartime atrocities, and civilian mass shootings: literature review.武装冲突、战时暴行及平民大规模枪击事件中与武器使用相关的死亡率:文献综述
BMJ. 1999 Aug 14;319(7207):407-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7207.407.