Suppr超能文献

[心脏导管检查范围内使用“智能针”进行多普勒超声引导下腹股沟血管穿刺的临床价值]

[Clinical value of Doppler ultrasound controlled puncture of the inguinal vessels with the "Smart Needle" within the scope of heart catheter examination].

作者信息

Blank R, Rupprecht H J, Schorrlepp M, Kopp H, Rahmani R

机构信息

II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1997 Aug;86(8):608-14. doi: 10.1007/s003920050100.

Abstract

Due to the increasing number of diagnostic heart catheterizations, especially in elderly patients, as well as the increase of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties, we are confronted with a rise in peripheral complications evolving from difficulties in the procedure of the puncture of the femoral artery or vene. The development of greater hematomas in the area of the puncture, the formation of arterio-venous fistulas and aneurysma spuria are the foremost complications. It was the aim of the study to investigate in as far an improved puncture technique could reduce the rate of peripheral complications. In this comparative study the vessel punctures were carried out by the conventional Judkins puncture technique and a new method using a special puncture needle. (Smart Needle" R), with an integrated ultrasonic sound device. In this study 114 patients--age 23 to 82 years--undergoing heart catheterization (91 diagnostics, 23 PTCAs) were examined. In all cases a puncture of the arterial and venous femoral vessel was done. 50 patients received a puncture via "Smart Needle" and the remaining 64 patients were punctured conventionally. In contrast to the group of patients receiving conventional puncture of the femoral artery, where in 72% more than one try was needed, in all patients of the "Smart Needle" group the first puncture was successive. Concerning the puncture of the venous vessels no significant difference between the two groups was observed. This difference between arterial and venous puncture outcome results from the difference between arterial and venous flow signals detected by the ultrasonic sound device. As to the bleeding complications hematomas following to "Smart Needle" puncture occurred less frequently-in 25%--and were significantly smaller than in the conventional group where hematomas were seen in 46%. The number of patients with hematomas with diameters of more than 5 cm was twice as high in the conventionaly punctured group (28%) than in the "Smart Needle" group (14%). However, patients suffering from arterial hypertension or hemostatic disorders showed an increased risk of vascular complications. In regard to the cost-benefit relation an indication for the use of the new technique is to be seen especially in overweight patients and patients suffering to aortic stenosis or cardiogenic shock.

摘要

由于诊断性心脏导管插入术的数量不断增加,尤其是在老年患者中,以及经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的增加,我们面临着因股动脉或静脉穿刺操作困难而导致的外周并发症增多的情况。穿刺部位出现更大的血肿、动静脉瘘的形成以及假性动脉瘤是最主要的并发症。本研究的目的是探讨改进的穿刺技术能在多大程度上降低外周并发症的发生率。在这项对比研究中,血管穿刺采用传统的Judkins穿刺技术和一种使用特殊穿刺针(“智能针”R)的新方法,该穿刺针带有集成超声装置。本研究对114例年龄在23至82岁之间接受心脏导管插入术的患者(91例诊断性检查,23例经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术)进行了检查。所有病例均对股动脉和股静脉进行了穿刺。50例患者通过“智能针”进行穿刺,其余64例患者采用传统方法穿刺。与接受股动脉传统穿刺的患者组相比,在该组中72%的患者需要不止一次尝试,而“智能针”组的所有患者首次穿刺均成功。关于静脉血管穿刺,两组之间未观察到显著差异。动脉和静脉穿刺结果的这种差异源于超声装置检测到的动脉和静脉血流信号的差异。至于出血并发症,“智能针”穿刺后血肿发生频率较低——为25%——且明显小于传统组,传统组中血肿发生率为46%。血肿直径超过5 cm的患者数量,传统穿刺组(28%)是“智能针”组(14%)的两倍。然而,患有动脉高血压或止血障碍的患者出现血管并发症的风险增加。就成本效益关系而言,新技术的使用指征尤其体现在超重患者以及患有主动脉瓣狭窄或心源性休克的患者身上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验