Karlsruher A E
Am J Community Psychol. 1976 Jun;4(2):145-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00881936.
Sixty poorly adjusted, fifth- and sixth-grade males were randomly assigned to experimental groups seen by professional, supervised nonprofessional, and unsupervised nonprofessional therapists, as well as to a no-treatment control. The therapists saw their clients 10 times. Excerpts from the 3rd and 7th sessions were rated by trained raters for facilitative conditions. Change in clients was studied through instruments which assessed change from three vantage points--the child's, his teacher's and his therapist's. Individual as well as group data demonstrated significant superiority of supervised nonprofessionals over unsupervised nonprofessionals. Changes in clients treated by professionals tended to cluster close to those treated by supervised nonprofessionals. Several significantly negative correlations between facilitative conditions and criteria of psychotherapeutic change were discovered.
60名适应不良的五、六年级男性被随机分配到由专业治疗师、有督导的非专业治疗师和无督导的非专业治疗师治疗的实验组,以及一个不接受治疗的对照组。治疗师对他们的客户进行了10次治疗。训练有素的评估者对第3次和第7次治疗的摘录进行了促进条件的评分。通过从三个有利视角——孩子自己、他的老师和他的治疗师——评估变化的工具来研究客户的变化。个体数据和组数据都表明,有督导的非专业治疗师比无督导的非专业治疗师具有显著优势。由专业治疗师治疗的客户的变化往往与由有督导的非专业治疗师治疗的客户的变化相近。发现促进条件与心理治疗变化标准之间存在几个显著的负相关。