Janelle C M, Barba D A, Frehlich S G, Tennant L K, Cauraugh J H
Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Florida, USA.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997 Dec;68(4):269-79. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1997.10608008.
This study was designed to examine whether participants who could control the schedule of performance feedback (KP) would learn differentially from those who received a rigid feedback schedule while learning a complex task. Participants (N = 48) were randomly assigned to self-controlled KP (SELF), summary KP (SUMMARY), yoked control (YOKE), or knowledge of results only (KR) conditions. Data collection consisted of an acquisition phase and a 4-day retention phase during which right-handed participants performed a left-handed ball throw. Overall, throwing form improved across trial blocks during acquisition, with the SUMMARY, SELF, and YOKE groups showing more improvement than the KR group. During retention, the SELF group retained a higher level of throwing form and accuracy in comparison to the other groups. Results suggest that when given the opportunity to control the feedback environment, learners require relatively less feedback to acquire skills and retain those skills at a level equivalent to or surpassing those who are given more feedback but receive it passively.
本研究旨在考察在学习一项复杂任务时,能够控制绩效反馈(KP)时间表的参与者与接受固定反馈时间表的参与者在学习方式上是否存在差异。参与者(N = 48)被随机分配到自我控制的KP(SELF)、总结性KP(SUMMARY)、匹配控制(YOKE)或仅结果知识(KR)条件组。数据收集包括一个习得阶段和一个为期4天的保持阶段,在此期间,右利手参与者进行左手投球。总体而言,在习得阶段,投掷形式在各试验块中有所改善,SUMMARY组、SELF组和YOKE组比KR组表现出更大的改善。在保持阶段,与其他组相比,SELF组保持了更高水平的投掷形式和准确性。结果表明,当有机会控制反馈环境时,学习者获取技能所需的反馈相对较少,并且能够将这些技能保持在与那些被动接受更多反馈的人相当或更高的水平。