Suppr超能文献

布鲁塞尔全科医生的紧急医疗调度

Emergency medical dispatching by general practitioners in Brussels.

作者信息

Renier W, Seys B

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 1995 Sep;2(3):160-71.

PMID:9422202
Abstract

The objective of this study was to introduce general practitioners (GPs) to the existing emergency medical services (EMS) system, in order to improve the response to emergency residential calls. The study was based in Brussels, which has 1 million residents. A GP dispatcher (GPD) was placed in the emergency dispatch centre, with a stand-by GP, together with adequate equipment, at his or her immediate disposal. A comparative evaluation was conducted in 1994 to measure the changes brought by the availability of a stand-by GP to the emergency medical dispatching performed by the GPD in an experimental zone (EZ) in comparison with a control zone (CZ). The evolution between a first period at the beginning of the year and a second period in September was also analysed. In total, 1059 residential emergency calls were included in the study. The amount of missing data in the filing cards, collaboration between the emergency medical dispatcher (EMD) and the GPD, and evaluation of the emergency levels were improved by training the GPD and the stand-by GP. Intervention times of the stand-by GP varied according to the level of the emergency. The sending of supplementary assistance after dispatching an EMS ambulance, a stand-by GP or a GP of an on-call service was significantly different in the EZ compared with the CZ. The percentage of EMS ambulances and GPs sent increased. The evolution between the two periods was characterized in the CZ by the disappearance of the supplementary assistance performed by the stand-by GP or by the GP of the on-call service and in the EZ by a slight but not significant increased use of the mobile intensive care units (MICUs) for initial assistance. A stand-by GP was used in about 10% of the cases as supplementary assistance. A large number of non-vital urgent complaints arrive at the dispatch centre. The availability of a stand-by GP does not cause an increase (rather a decrease) in MICU use in initial care and supplementary assistance. It causes a decrease in the total EMS ambulances and transport to hospital and an increase in the use of EMS ambulances and stand-by GP as supplementary assistance. Following stand-by GP intervention, only 25% of visited people are hospitalized. Introduction of GPs is relevant because they are used to discerning critical events from a large number of non-critical disorders. The GPD can adapt the emergency medical dispatching by using a stand-by GP, without compromising the medical assistance to vital emergencies.

摘要

本研究的目的是将全科医生(GPs)引入现有的紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统,以改善对居民紧急呼叫的响应。该研究以拥有100万居民的布鲁塞尔为基地。在紧急调度中心安排了一名全科医生调度员(GPD),并配备一名待命全科医生以及足够的设备供其即时使用。1994年进行了一项对比评估,以衡量待命全科医生的可用性给GPD在实验区(EZ)与对照区(CZ)进行的紧急医疗调度所带来的变化。还分析了年初第一个时期与9月第二个时期之间的演变情况。该研究总共纳入了1059次居民紧急呼叫。通过培训GPD和待命全科医生,改善了档案卡片中的数据缺失量、紧急医疗调度员(EMD)与GPD之间的协作以及紧急程度评估。待命全科医生的干预时间因紧急程度而异。与CZ相比,EZ在调度EMS救护车、待命全科医生或值班服务的全科医生后派遣补充援助的情况有显著差异。派遣的EMS救护车和全科医生的百分比增加。两个时期之间的演变在CZ的特点是待命全科医生或值班服务的全科医生进行的补充援助消失,而在EZ的特点是用于初始援助的移动重症监护单元(MICU)的使用略有增加但不显著。在约10%的病例中使用待命全科医生作为补充援助。大量非紧急的紧急投诉到达调度中心。待命全科医生的可用性不会导致初始护理和补充援助中MICU使用增加(反而减少)。它会导致EMS救护车总数和送往医院的运输量减少,以及作为补充援助使用EMS救护车和待命全科医生的情况增加。在待命全科医生干预后,只有25%的就诊人员住院。引入全科医生是有意义的,因为他们习惯于从大量非关键病症中辨别关键事件。GPD可以通过使用待命全科医生来调整紧急医疗调度,而不会损害对危及生命的紧急情况的医疗援助。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验