Bot G, Blake A D, Li S, Reisine T
Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
J Neurochem. 1998 Jan;70(1):358-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70010358.x.
To investigate the role of Asp114 in the cloned rat mu-opioid receptor for ligand binding, the charged amino acid was mutated to an asparagine to generate the mutant mu receptor D114N. The wild-type mu receptor and the D114N mutant were then stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, and the binding affinities of a series of opioids were investigated. The mu-selective agonists [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin and morphine and the endogenous peptides Met-enkephalin and beta-endorphin exhibited greatly reduced affinities for the D114N mutant compared with the wild-type mu receptor, as did the potent synthetic agonist etorphine. In contrast to the full agonists, the partial agonists buprenorphine and nalorphine and the antagonists diprenorphine and naloxone bound with similar affinities to the wild-type and D114N mutant mu receptors. The reduced affinities of the full agonists for the D114N mutant did not involve an uncoupling of the receptor from G proteins because methadone and etorphine stimulated the D114N mu receptors to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Although the Asp114 to Asn114 mutation reduced full-agonist binding, mutation of His297 to Asn297 in the mu receptor did not but, in contrast, did reduce binding affinity of the partial agonist buprenorphine and the antagonist diprenorphine. These results indicate that some partial agonists and antagonists may have different determinants for binding to the mu receptor than do the prototypical full agonists.
为了研究天冬氨酸114在克隆的大鼠μ-阿片受体配体结合中的作用,将这个带电荷的氨基酸突变为天冬酰胺,以产生突变型μ受体D114N。然后,野生型μ受体和D114N突变体在人胚肾293细胞中稳定表达,并研究了一系列阿片类药物的结合亲和力。与野生型μ受体相比,μ选择性激动剂[D-丙氨酸2,甲硫苯丙氨酸4,甘醇5]脑啡肽、吗啡以及内源性肽甲硫脑啡肽和β-内啡肽对D114N突变体的亲和力大幅降低,强效合成激动剂埃托啡也是如此。与完全激动剂不同,部分激动剂丁丙诺啡和纳洛啡以及拮抗剂二丙诺啡和纳洛酮与野生型和D114N突变体μ受体的结合亲和力相似。完全激动剂对D114N突变体亲和力的降低并不涉及受体与G蛋白的解偶联,因为美沙酮和埃托啡刺激D114N μ受体抑制腺苷酸环化酶。虽然天冬氨酸114突变为天冬酰胺114降低了完全激动剂的结合,但μ受体中组氨酸297突变为天冬酰胺297并没有降低,相反,却降低了部分激动剂丁丙诺啡和拮抗剂二丙诺啡的结合亲和力。这些结果表明,一些部分激动剂和拮抗剂与典型的完全激动剂相比,可能具有不同的μ受体结合决定因素。