• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颏成形术中螺钉内固定与钢丝内固定的比较:一项关于骨骼稳定性的回顾性研究

Screw osteosynthesis compared with wire osteosynthesis in advancement genioplasty: a retrospective study of skeletal stability.

作者信息

Reyneke J P, Johnston T, van der Linden W J

机构信息

Division of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Oct;35(5):352-6. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(97)90409-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0266-4356(97)90409-5
PMID:9427445
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the skeletal stability of wire and screw fixation after advancement genioplasty.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital and private practice, South Africa.

SUBJECTS

40 Patients who required advancement genioplasty, 20 in each group.

INTERVENTIONS

Advancement genioplasty measurements made on cephalometric radiographs before and immediately after operation, and at least 6 months later.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison of horizontal and vertical measurements.

RESULTS

In the screw (rigid) group mean horizontal advancement was 6.3 mm followed by a relapse of 0.3 mm during the follow up period. The corresponding figures for the wire (non-rigid) group were 5.8 and 0.5 mm. The two differed significantly in the degree of vertical change but the result is clinically unimportant. There was no difference in the degree of horizontal change.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in skeletal stability between the two groups.

摘要

目的

比较颏成形术前进后退术后钢丝固定和螺钉固定的骨骼稳定性。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

南非的教学医院和私人诊所。

研究对象

40例行颏成形术前进后退术的患者,每组20例。

干预措施

在术前、术后即刻及至少6个月后对头影测量X线片进行颏成形术前进后退术测量。

主要观察指标

水平和垂直测量的比较。

结果

螺钉(刚性)组平均水平前移6.3mm,随访期间复发0.3mm。钢丝(非刚性)组的相应数字分别为5.8mm和0.5mm。两组在垂直变化程度上有显著差异,但结果在临床上并不重要。水平变化程度无差异。

结论

两组之间的骨骼稳定性无差异。

相似文献

1
Screw osteosynthesis compared with wire osteosynthesis in advancement genioplasty: a retrospective study of skeletal stability.颏成形术中螺钉内固定与钢丝内固定的比较:一项关于骨骼稳定性的回顾性研究
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Oct;35(5):352-6. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(97)90409-5.
2
Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty.下颌前徙采用坚固内固定与钢丝固定并联合或不联合颏成形术时软组织变化的维持情况。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Aug;92(2):142-9. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.115462.
3
Long-term hard and soft tissue relapse rate after genioplasty.颏成形术后长期软硬组织复发率
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Feb;91(2):153-6. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.112392.
4
Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.上颌和下颌联合手术后骨性III类错牙合的稳定性。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001 Fall;16(3):179-92.
5
Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.上颌与下颌联合手术后Ⅲ类骨性错牙合的稳定性:下颌骨坚固内固定与钢丝骨缝合术的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Feb;62(2):169-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.010.
6
Stability of the chin after advancement genioplasty using absorbable plate and screws with template devices.采用模板装置的可吸收板和螺钉颏前徙术后颏部的稳定性。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Oct;47(10):1498-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.027. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Cost comparison of genioplasty: when indicated, wire osteosynthesis is more cost effective than plate and screw fixation.
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;18(4):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s10006-013-0437-y. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
8
Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary advancement: a comparison of combined wire fixation and rigid fixation.上颌前徙术中Le Fort I型截骨术的稳定性:钢丝固定与坚固内固定的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Mar;53(3):243-8; discussion 248-9. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90217-1.
9
Comparison of rigid and semirigid fixation for advancement genioplasty.颏成形术前移中刚性固定与半刚性固定的比较。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013 Sep;12(3):260-5. doi: 10.1007/s12663-012-0430-2. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
10
Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone: a case series.仅采用前路内固定的Le Fort I型截骨术的稳定性:病例系列
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;63(5):629-34. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.12.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of screw and plate osteosynthesis in advancement genioplasty: a finite element analysis study.颏成形术中螺钉与钢板骨固定术的比较:一项有限元分析研究
Eur Oral Res. 2025 Jan 5;59(1):40-45. doi: 10.26650/eor.20241371296.
2
Musculoskeletal Changes as a Sequel to Advancement Genioplasty: A Long-Term Cephalometric Prospective Study.颏成形术后续的肌肉骨骼变化:一项长期头影测量前瞻性研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Jun;17(2):233-241. doi: 10.1007/s12663-017-1025-8. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
Evaluation of ultrasonic and conventional surgical techniques for genioplasty combined with two different osteosynthesis plates: a cadaveric study.
评价超声与常规手术技术在下颌骨整形术中联合应用两种不同接骨板固定的效果:一项尸体研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Nov;21(8):2437-2444. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2040-8. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Comparison of rigid and semirigid fixation for advancement genioplasty.颏成形术前移中刚性固定与半刚性固定的比较。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013 Sep;12(3):260-5. doi: 10.1007/s12663-012-0430-2. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
5
Cost comparison of genioplasty: when indicated, wire osteosynthesis is more cost effective than plate and screw fixation.
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;18(4):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s10006-013-0437-y. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
6
Medpore versus osseous augmentation in genioplasty procedure: A comparison.Medpore与颏成形术骨增量术的比较
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;1(1):1-5. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.69147.